0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Learning to discuss safety within the European seaweed aquaculture sector

Aquaculture International 2023 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
S.W.K. van den Burg, Sophie J. I. Koch, J.L. Banach, Y. Hoffmans, Luc van Hoof, R.W. Nauta, R.G. Jak, E. Makri, Emma Wadsworth, Søren Post, Kasper Kristensen

Summary

This paper is not about microplastics. It introduces a generic safety assessment protocol for the European seaweed aquaculture sector, covering food safety, environmental safety, and occupational health. While seaweed farming occurs in marine environments where microplastics are present, the study focuses on developing safety frameworks for the aquaculture industry rather than addressing microplastic contamination.

Abstract Seaweed is seen as a promising future source of biomass, and significant efforts are taken to upscale seaweed aquaculture production in Europe. Despite regulatory frameworks for food safety, environmental safety, and occupational health and safety applicable to seaweed production, a major barrier to upscaling production is the lack of commonly accepted, uniform frameworks for safety assessment. As a consequence, efforts to deal with food safety, environmental safety, and occupational health and safety are fragmented. Based on a literature review and consultations with stakeholders, this paper introduces a generic protocol on how to approach safety of the production of seaweed. A prototype version of the generic protocol was evaluated in a practical setting in Norway. Results show that a consistent, structured approach to safety makes it possible to identify hazards and prioritize and collect data on key hazards. The protocol facilitated a sector discussion on safety, providing a shared discourse to talk about safety. It must be acknowledged that the farming and processing practices and the location of cultivation strongly influence which hazards are most relevant. The protocol succeeded in bringing focus to data collection, putting effort into the analysis of hazards considered most relevant in a practical setting.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Food safety in the seaweed food supply chain : Inventory of production, consumption and chemical and physical hazards

This Dutch food safety report inventories the chemical and physical hazards — including microplastics — present in seaweed cultivated for human consumption. As the seaweed food market grows, understanding contamination risks including plastic particles is important for protecting consumer health.

Article Tier 2

Development of a framework and toolbox for measuring and evaluating ecosystem interactions of seaweed aquaculture

This Dutch-language study (mostly in Dutch) developed a framework and toolbox for measuring ecosystem integrity in seaweed cultivation areas off the Dutch coast, relevant to scaling up sustainable aquaculture. Healthy coastal ecosystems with minimal microplastic contamination are important for sustainable seaweed production.

Article Tier 2

Food safety hazards in the European seaweed chain

Researchers reviewed food safety hazards in the European seaweed supply chain, ranking 22 potential hazards based on available evidence. Arsenic, cadmium, iodine, and Salmonella were identified as major hazards, while micro- and nanoplastics were among the hazards where significant data gaps exist. The study recommends collecting more data on these under-researched hazards, noting that factors like seaweed type, cultivation location, and processing methods all influence contaminant levels.

Article Tier 2

A baseline studies programme for sustainable and resilient seaweed cultivation in Faroese fjords

Researchers developed a baseline environmental studies programme for seaweed cultivation in Faroese fjords, scoping potential impacts on the marine environment and recommending a monitoring programme to support sustainable and resilient aquaculture development in the Faroe Islands.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Developing the Use of Wool Rope within Aquaculture—A Systematic Review

This systematic review explores whether wool rope could replace plastic rope in seaweed aquaculture, reducing plastic pollution in marine environments. The research is directly relevant to microplastic concerns because conventional plastic ropes used in ocean farming gradually break down into microplastic particles that contaminate marine ecosystems and the seafood we eat.

Share this paper