0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastic removal by Red Sea giant clam (Tridacna maxima)

Environmental Pollution 2019 121 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Silvia Arossa, Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Silvia Arossa, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Susann Rossbach, Cecilia Martin, Susann Rossbach, Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Susann Rossbach, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Cecilia Martin, Carlos M. Duarte Silvia Arossa, Carlos M. Duarte Silvia Arossa, Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte Carlos M. Duarte

Summary

Giant clams from the Red Sea were exposed to polyethylene microbeads across two size classes for 12 days, with clams actively retaining an average of ~7.55 beads/individual/day and shells serving as an additional sink for adhered particles. The study is the first to quantify microplastic ingestion by giant clams and identifies both digestive tissue and shell structure as retention sites.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

This study assesses for the first time the ingestion of microplastics by giant clams and evaluates their importance as a sink for this pollutant. A total of 24 individuals of two size classes were collected from the Red Sea and then exposed for 12 days to 4 concentrations of polyethylene microbeads ranging from 53 to 500 μm. Experiments revealed that clams actively take up microplastic from the water column and the average of beads retained inside the animal was ∼7.55 ± 1.89 beads individual day (5.76 ± 1.16 MPs/g dw). However, the digestive tract itself cannot be considered the only sink of microbeads in Tridacnids. Indeed, shells play a key role as well. The abundance of microplastic adhering to the shells, which was estimated directly, was positively correlated to the concentration of beads found in the surrounding seawater. Therefore, clams' shells contribute to the removal of 66.03 ± 2.50% of the microplastic present in the water column. Furthermore, stress responses to the exposure to polyethylene were investigated. Gross Primary Production:Respiration (GPP:R) ratio decreased throughout of the experiment, but no significant difference was found between treatments and controls.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper