0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Microplastics delay Paramecium multimicronucleatum to eliminate toxic Microcystis aeruginosa population

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zhihao Shao, Yuzhou Hou, Qianwen Yu, Xiaoqing Xu, Yunfei Sun, Lu Zhang, Xiaojun Wang, Zhou Yang

Summary

Researchers examined how microplastics affect the ability of the protozoan Paramecium multimicronucleatum to eliminate toxic Microcystis aeruginosa populations in aquatic systems, testing combinations of initial algal densities and MP concentrations from 0 to 4 mg/L. They found that MP concentrations as low as 0.5 mg/L significantly reduced Paramecium grazing rates, delaying the elimination of the cyanobacterial bloom and suggesting that microplastic pollution could impair natural biological controls of harmful algae.

Assessing the feasibility of elimination of harmful Microcystis by protozoa from aquatic ecosystems requires evaluating the removal ability of protozoa under environmentally relevant pollutant conditions. Microplastics widely present in waters not only affect the individual organisms, but also interfere with the interspecific dynamics between predator and prey, including zooplankton and algae. To evaluate the effects of microplastics on protozoa eliminating toxic Microcystis, we designed an experiment of Paramecium grazing on Microcystis under different initial densities of Microcystis (2.0 × 10 and 1.0 × 10 cells mL) and microplastics concentrations (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg L). The results showed that Paramecium was able to eliminate the Microcystis populations, but when microplastics reached 0.5 or 1.0 mg L, it significantly reduced the grazing rate of Paramecium (from 1.3 × 10 to 0.8 × 10 preys predator d under 2 × 10 cells mL; from 4.9 × 10 to 2.1 × 10 preys predator d under 1 × 10 cells mL) and extended the time to eliminate Microcystis (from 4 to 6 d under 2 × 10 cells mL; from 8.7 to 11 d under 1 × 10 cells mL). Additionally, higher initial densities of Microcystis prolonged elimination time from 4 to 8 to 8.7-11 d. Overall, these findings suggest that microplastics delay the top-down effects through reducing grazing rate of Paramecium, which is an issue that cannot be ignored in practical complex water environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics interfere with mixotrophic Ochromonas eliminating toxic Microcystis

Researchers investigated how microplastics of two sizes (0.07 and 3 µm) affect the ability of the mixotrophic flagellate Ochromonas gloeopara to predate on and eliminate toxic Microcystis aeruginosa blooms. They found that microplastics at all tested concentrations and sizes reduced maximum Microcystis abundance but also harmed Ochromonas, suggesting that microplastic pollution could disrupt the natural biocontrol of harmful algal blooms in freshwater systems.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polystyrene microplastics on growth, physiological traits of Microcystis aeruginosa and microcystin production and release

Researchers examined how polystyrene microplastics of various sizes affect the growth and toxin production of the harmful algae Microcystis aeruginosa. They found that microplastics inhibited algal growth at low densities, with the smallest particles causing the greatest inhibition, and also disrupted the algae's antioxidant defense system. Notably, microplastic exposure led to a significant increase in the production of the toxin microcystin-LR, raising concerns about how microplastic pollution could worsen harmful algal blooms.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Ecological risk analysis and prediction of microplastics' effects on Microcystis aeruginosa in freshwater system: a meta-analysis approach

This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics can both inhibit and stimulate the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa — a harmful algal bloom cyanobacterium — depending on particle size and degradability. Smaller, degradable plastics tend to promote algal growth, suggesting microplastic pollution could worsen toxic algal blooms in freshwater systems used for drinking water.

Article Tier 2

Responses of Microcystis aeruginosa to polystyrene microplastics: Growth dynamics and implications for water treatment

Researchers studied how polystyrene microplastics affect the harmful freshwater algae Microcystis aeruginosa, which causes toxic algal blooms. They found that while microplastics initially suppressed algae growth, the algae eventually adapted and grew even more, producing higher levels of the dangerous toxin microcystin. The study suggests that microplastic pollution in freshwater could worsen harmful algal blooms and create additional water treatment challenges.

Article Tier 2

Does microplastic ingestion dramatically decrease the biomass of protozoa grazers? A case study on the marine ciliate Uronema marinum

Feeding experiments tested whether microplastic ingestion by the marine ciliate Uronema marinum dramatically reduced its biomass when grazing on bacteria, a key step in the microbial loop. Microplastic exposure reduced ciliate grazing efficiency and biomass, suggesting that protozoan grazers, an important link in microbial food webs, are negatively affected by microplastic contamination.

Share this paper