We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics interfere with mixotrophic Ochromonas eliminating toxic Microcystis
Summary
Researchers investigated how microplastics of two sizes (0.07 and 3 µm) affect the ability of the mixotrophic flagellate Ochromonas gloeopara to predate on and eliminate toxic Microcystis aeruginosa blooms. They found that microplastics at all tested concentrations and sizes reduced maximum Microcystis abundance but also harmed Ochromonas, suggesting that microplastic pollution could disrupt the natural biocontrol of harmful algal blooms in freshwater systems.
Microplastics with different sizes exist widely in fresh waters, which may affect the interspecific dynamics between predator and prey. The flagellate Ochromonas gloeopara can efficiently eliminate Microcystis aeruginosa and degrade microcystins, which shows great potential for controlling harmful Microcystis. In order to evaluate the effects of microplastics on O. gloeopara eliminating Microcystis, we designed an experiment of O. gloeopara feeding on Microcystis under different sizes (0.07 and 3 μm) and concentrations (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, and 2.0 mg L) of microplastics. The results showed that maximum abundance of M. aeruginosa decreased significantly with addition of microplastics, regardless of the size and concentration. O. gloeopara can ingest the microplastics and suffer from their adverse effects. The maximum abundance of O. gloeopara decreased with enhancing concentrations of 3 μm microplastics during the process of O. gloeopara eliminating M. aeruginosa, whereas 0.07 μm microplastics did not affect the growth of O. gloeopara obviously. During the period of exposure under microplastics, clearance rate of O. gloeopara on M. aeruginosa decreased with the increasing concentrations of microplastics. Specially, 3 μm microplastics had a stronger reduction on clearance rate of O. gloeopara. The time to M. aeruginosa extinction was prolonged with the increasing concentrations of microplastics in both sizes. Comparatively speaking, 3 μm microplastics had a stronger delayed effect on the removal of Microcystis. These findings suggest that microplastics can interfere with protozoa eliminating toxic Microcystis, which may aggravate their adverse impacts on aquatic ecosystem.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics delay Paramecium multimicronucleatum to eliminate toxic Microcystis aeruginosa population
Researchers examined how microplastics affect the ability of the protozoan Paramecium multimicronucleatum to eliminate toxic Microcystis aeruginosa populations in aquatic systems, testing combinations of initial algal densities and MP concentrations from 0 to 4 mg/L. They found that MP concentrations as low as 0.5 mg/L significantly reduced Paramecium grazing rates, delaying the elimination of the cyanobacterial bloom and suggesting that microplastic pollution could impair natural biological controls of harmful algae.
Responses of Microcystis aeruginosa to polystyrene microplastics: Growth dynamics and implications for water treatment
Researchers studied how polystyrene microplastics affect the harmful freshwater algae Microcystis aeruginosa, which causes toxic algal blooms. They found that while microplastics initially suppressed algae growth, the algae eventually adapted and grew even more, producing higher levels of the dangerous toxin microcystin. The study suggests that microplastic pollution in freshwater could worsen harmful algal blooms and create additional water treatment challenges.
Size-dependent toxic effects of polystyrene microplastic exposure on Microcystis aeruginosa growth and microcystin production
Researchers exposed the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa to polystyrene microplastics of two sizes and found that particle size significantly influenced the effects. The larger 1-micrometer particles promoted algal growth while aggregating on cell surfaces and inhibiting photosynthesis, whereas 100-nanometer particles stimulated toxin production. The study suggests that microplastic pollution in freshwater may have complex, size-dependent effects on harmful algal blooms and their toxin output.
Microplastics and the freshwater plankton: Effects on grazing and mortality
This study exposed natural freshwater zooplankton communities to polyethylene microplastics of different sizes and found that the smallest particles (1-5 micrometers) were ingested most frequently, leading to reduced feeding on algae and increased mortality. When zooplankton ate microplastics instead of food, algae populations grew unchecked, disrupting the natural balance of the ecosystem. Since zooplankton are a key food source for fish, this disruption could ripple through the food chain and affect the quality of freshwater fish consumed by humans.
Ecological risk analysis and prediction of microplastics' effects on Microcystis aeruginosa in freshwater system: a meta-analysis approach
This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics can both inhibit and stimulate the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa — a harmful algal bloom cyanobacterium — depending on particle size and degradability. Smaller, degradable plastics tend to promote algal growth, suggesting microplastic pollution could worsen toxic algal blooms in freshwater systems used for drinking water.