0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Natural or synthetic – how global trends in textile usage threaten freshwater environments

The Science of The Total Environment 2019 165 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Catherine Stone, Fredric M. Windsor, Max Munday, Isabelle Durance

Summary

Researchers compared the freshwater environmental impacts of natural wool and synthetic polyester textiles across their entire lifecycle. They found that wool poses the greatest risk during production, while polyester textiles are most harmful during use and disposal phases, largely through microfiber release. The study highlights that both natural and synthetic textiles present substantial challenges for freshwater environments, requiring tailored solutions in different regions.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

As the global demand for textiles increases, so to do the potential environmental impacts that stem from their production, use and disposal. Freshwater ecosystems are particularly at risk: rivers often act as the primary recipients of waste generated during the production of textiles and are subject to pollutants released during the broader lifecycle of a textile product. Here, we investigate how global technological and societal processes shape the way we produce, use and dispose of textiles, and what this means for the environmental quality and ecological health of freshwaters. We examine two predominant 'natural' and synthetic textiles (wool and Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), respectively), and find that risks to freshwater ecosystems vary throughout the lifecycle of these textiles; and across geographies, in-line with regulatory and economic landscapes. Woollen textiles pose most risk during the Production Phase, while PET textiles pose most risk during the Use and Disposal Phases. Our findings show that: (i) both 'natural' and synthetic textiles present substantial challenges for freshwater environments; and (ii) bespoke solutions are needed in areas of the world where the global division of labour and less stringent environmental regulations have concentrated textile production; but also in regions where high textile consumption combines with unsustainable disposal behaviours. Effective mitigation may combine technological advances with societal changes in market mechanisms, regulations, textile use and disposal.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type

A comparative environmental assessment of different textile fiber types found that synthetic fibers like polyester had lower production impacts in some categories but higher use-phase impacts due to microfiber shedding during washing. The findings underscore that the environmental impact of synthetic textiles cannot be evaluated from production alone — fiber release during laundering adds a significant pollution pathway.

Article Tier 2

Eco-friendly or eco-threat? The environmental risks of natural and semi-synthetic fibers

This review examines emerging evidence that natural and semi-synthetic textile fibers (cotton, viscose, wool) contribute significantly to environmental microfiber pollution, comparable in scale to synthetic fibers. The authors challenge assumptions of negligible ecological impact and call for natural and semi-synthetic fibers to be included in microplastic pollution assessments.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Impacts of non-petroleum and petroleum-based microfibers on aquatic organisms: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis compared the toxic effects of petroleum-based and non-petroleum microfibers on aquatic organisms. Surprisingly, natural fibers like cotton and viscose also caused significant biological harm, not just synthetic ones like polyester and nylon. This means that even "natural" textiles shed fibers that can damage aquatic ecosystems, complicating the assumption that non-synthetic clothing is automatically safer for the environment.

Article Tier 2

Role of Textile Industries in Microfiber Pollution

This review examines the role of textile industries in generating microfiber pollution, tracing microfiber release during fabric production, consumer use, laundering, and end-of-life disposal as synthetic textile demand grows with fast fashion. The review documents pathways by which textile microfibers enter freshwater and marine environments and accumulate in aquatic biota, linking industry growth trends to escalating environmental microfiber loads.

Article Tier 2

A critical review on environmental pollution caused by the textile industry

This review examines how the textile industry contributes to environmental pollution, including the release of microplastics from synthetic fibers during washing. The study highlights that non-biodegradable materials like polyester, nylon, and acrylic shed microplastic fibers that enter water systems, potentially harming marine organisms and entering the human food chain.

Share this paper