We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Hazard evaluation of polystyrene nanoplastic with nine bioassays did not show particle-specific acute toxicity
Summary
Researchers tested polystyrene nanoplastics across nine toxicity assays using ten organisms and found no particle-specific acute toxicity — apparent toxicity in three assays was traced to water-soluble additives (surfactants and a biocide) in the commercial nanoplastic preparations rather than the plastic particles themselves.
Plastic is a wide-spread pollutant and must be evaluated for potential adverse effects of its breakdown product, microplastic (≤5 mm) along with its subfraction, nanoplastic (1-100 nm). Risk assessment of pollutants cannot be conducted without their toxicity (dose-response) data. In this study, toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPL) was evaluated using 8 acute and 1 subchronic toxicity assays with 10 organisms of different biological complexity (bacteria, yeast, algae, protozoans, mammalian cells in vitro, crustaceans, midge larvae). Commercial 26 and 100 nm carboxylated PS-NPL spheres were chosen as model and tested in nominal concentrations up to 100 mg/L (1.025·10 26 nm and 1.83·10 100 nm particles/L). In most of the assays, both PS-NPL proved non-toxic (L(E)C > 100 mg/L) but three tests (V. fischeri, R. subcapitata, D. magna) flagged toxicity in 'as received' 26 nm PS-NPL and D. magna also in 100 nm PS-NPL (EC ranging from 13 to 71 mg/L). As, according to manufacturers, both PS-NPL suspensions contained additives (surfactants and biocidal NaN), the three toxicity tests were repeated also on dialysed PS-NPL and on NaN Non-toxicity of dialysed PS-NPL indicated that the toxicity of 'as-received' PS-NPL was not particle-specific but false positive due to water-soluble additives in the PS-NPL preparations. NaN was very toxic to D. magna (48 h EC = 0.05 ± 0.03 mg NaN/L), toxic to R. subcapitata (72 h EC = 4.97 ± 3.7 mg NaN/L) and non-toxic to V. fischeri. Toxicity of 'as-received' PS-NPL was not fully explainable by NaN but also attributable to other additives in the suspensions. Toxicity research of microplastic using commercial model particles must always consider the potential influence of additives, e.g. test the toxicity of dialysed NPL for comparison. In our study, D. magna, R. subcapitata and V. fischeri were the most sensitive to PS-NPL water-soluble additives and flagged their presence in NPL preparations.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Review of ecotoxicological studies of widely used polystyrene nanoparticles
Researchers reviewed ecotoxicological studies on manufactured polystyrene nanoparticles and their effects on aquatic organisms. They found that many studies used insufficiently characterized particles and short-term exposure conditions that may not reflect real environmental scenarios. The review recommends improved particle characterization, proper purification before testing, and longer-term exposure studies to generate more environmentally relevant toxicity data.
Toxicity Assessments of Micro- and Nanoplastics Can Be Confounded by Preservatives in Commercial Formulations
Researchers discovered that preservatives commonly found in commercial polystyrene particle formulations, such as sodium azide, can significantly skew toxicity results in micro- and nanoplastic studies. The study suggests that many published findings on plastic toxicity may be confounded by these chemical additives rather than reflecting the effects of the plastic particles themselves.
Defining the size ranges of polystyrene nanoplastics according to their ability to cross biological barriers
Researchers systematically examined polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes to define the size ranges at which they can cross biological barriers, providing a more precise definition of nanoplastic dimensions relevant to toxicological assessment.
Review of the toxic effects and mechanisms of polystyrene micro/nanoplastics across multiple animal species
This review comprehensively examines the toxic effects of polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics across marine animals, freshwater species, soil organisms, and mammals. Researchers found that these particles can cause damage at multiple biological levels, affecting the digestive, respiratory, nervous, reproductive, and circulatory systems. The study highlights the widespread environmental presence of polystyrene plastics and the need to better understand how they harm living organisms.
Hazard of polystyrene micro-and nanospheres to selected aquatic and terrestrial organisms
Researchers reviewed 294 studies on the toxicity of polystyrene micro- and nanospheres to various organisms including microorganisms, invertebrates, fish, and plants. The study found that aquatic invertebrates were the most studied group, nanosized particles received more attention than microsized ones, and roughly 40% of the data showed no observable effects on organisms.