0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Remediation Sign in to save

Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019 194 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Therése Karlsson, Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Therése Karlsson, Therése Karlsson, Anna Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Anna Kärrman, Therése Karlsson, Anna Kärrman, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Anna Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Kärrman, Anna Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Therése Karlsson, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv Anna Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Anna Rotander, Therése Karlsson, Anna Rotander, Anna Kärrman, Therése Karlsson, Martin Hassellöv Therése Karlsson, Anna Kärrman, Martin Hassellöv Martin Hassellöv

Summary

This methodological study compared manta trawl and in situ pump filtration approaches for sampling surface water microplastics, providing guidance for consistent visual identification of plastic particles. Standardizing sampling and identification methods is critical for making meaningful comparisons between different research studies.

Polymers

Owing to the development and adoption of a variety of methods for sampling and identifying microplastics, there is now data showing the presence of microplastics in surface waters from all over the world. The difference between the methods, however, hampers comparisons, and to date, most studies are qualitative rather than quantitative. In order to allow for a quantitative comparison of microplastics abundance, it is crucial to understand the differences between sampling methods. Therefore, a manta trawl and an in situ filtering pump were compared during realistic, but controlled, field tests. Identical microplastic analyses of all replicates allowed the differences between the methods with respect to (1) precision, (2) concentrations, and (3) composition to be assessed. The results show that the pump gave higher accuracy with respect to volume than the trawl. The trawl, however, sampled higher concentrations, which appeared to be due to a more efficient sampling of particles on the sea surface microlayer, such as expanded polystyrene and air-filled microspheres. The trawl also sampled a higher volume, which decreased statistical counting uncertainties. A key finding in this study was that, regardless of sampling method, it is critical that a sufficiently high volume is sampled to provide enough particles for statistical evaluation. Due to the patchiness of this type of contaminant, our data indicate that a minimum of 26 particles per sample should be recorded to allow for concentration comparisons and to avoid false null values. The necessary amount of replicates to detect temporal or spatial differences is also discussed. For compositional differences and size distributions, even higher particle counts would be necessary. Quantitative measurements and comparisons would also require an unbiased approach towards both visual and spectroscopic identification. To facilitate the development of such methods, a visual protocol that can be further developed to fit different needs is introduced and discussed. Some of the challenges encountered while using FTIR microspectroscopic particle identification are also critically discussed in relation to specific compositions found.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper