0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Remediation Sign in to save

Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019 194 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This methodological study compared manta trawl and in situ pump filtration approaches for sampling surface water microplastics, providing guidance for consistent visual identification of plastic particles. Standardizing sampling and identification methods is critical for making meaningful comparisons between different research studies.

Polymers

Owing to the development and adoption of a variety of methods for sampling and identifying microplastics, there is now data showing the presence of microplastics in surface waters from all over the world. The difference between the methods, however, hampers comparisons, and to date, most studies are qualitative rather than quantitative. In order to allow for a quantitative comparison of microplastics abundance, it is crucial to understand the differences between sampling methods. Therefore, a manta trawl and an in situ filtering pump were compared during realistic, but controlled, field tests. Identical microplastic analyses of all replicates allowed the differences between the methods with respect to (1) precision, (2) concentrations, and (3) composition to be assessed. The results show that the pump gave higher accuracy with respect to volume than the trawl. The trawl, however, sampled higher concentrations, which appeared to be due to a more efficient sampling of particles on the sea surface microlayer, such as expanded polystyrene and air-filled microspheres. The trawl also sampled a higher volume, which decreased statistical counting uncertainties. A key finding in this study was that, regardless of sampling method, it is critical that a sufficiently high volume is sampled to provide enough particles for statistical evaluation. Due to the patchiness of this type of contaminant, our data indicate that a minimum of 26 particles per sample should be recorded to allow for concentration comparisons and to avoid false null values. The necessary amount of replicates to detect temporal or spatial differences is also discussed. For compositional differences and size distributions, even higher particle counts would be necessary. Quantitative measurements and comparisons would also require an unbiased approach towards both visual and spectroscopic identification. To facilitate the development of such methods, a visual protocol that can be further developed to fit different needs is introduced and discussed. Some of the challenges encountered while using FTIR microspectroscopic particle identification are also critically discussed in relation to specific compositions found.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Comprehensive Comparison of Various Microplastic Sampling Methods in Sea Water: Implications for Data Compilation

AI summary Read the abstract

This study systematically compared multiple microplastic sampling methods used in seawater, evaluating manta trawls, pumping systems, and other approaches to identify sources of data inconsistency that complicate comparisons between studies.

Article Tier 2

On the representativeness of pump water samples versus manta sampling in microplastic analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared pump sampling and manta net sampling methods for measuring microplastic concentrations in water and found that the two methods produced different results, highlighting how sampling technique choice significantly affects the representativeness and comparability of microplastic pollution data.

Article Tier 2

Comparison between the traditional Manta net and an innovative device for microplastic sampling in surface marine waters

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared a standard Manta net sampling device with a new microplastic sampler called MuMi for collecting microplastics from marine surface water, finding significant variability between the methods related to mesh size, sampling depth, and volume control. This comparison highlights the critical importance of standardizing sampling methods so that microplastic data from different studies can be meaningfully compared.

Article Tier 2

Comparative study of three sampling methods for microplastics analysis in seawater

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared three microplastic sampling methods for seawater — direct 0.45 µm filtration, 20 µm pre-concentration followed by 0.45 µm filtration, and Manta trawl with 150 µm mesh — finding orders-of-magnitude differences in reported abundance across methods, underscoring the critical need for standardized protocols.

Article Tier 2

Methods for microplastic sampling and analysis in the seawater and fresh water environment

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarized and compared sampling and analysis methods for microplastics in marine and freshwater environments — including trawls, manta nets, pump filtration, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy — and called for standardization to enable cross-study comparisons of pollution levels.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper