0
Article Tier 2 Remediation Sign in to save

Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge

Environmental Pollution 2019 589 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tracked microplastics through a wastewater treatment plant and found 12 different polymer types in effluents and sludge, with smaller particles (25–104 μm) most abundant and fibres displaying lower sizes than fragments. The study demonstrates that WWTPs do not fully remove microplastics and that processed sludge marketed as soil amendment carries plastic contamination.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

This work studied the occurrence of microplastics in primary and secondary effluents and mixed sludge of a WWTP as well as in processed heat-dried sludge marketed as soil amendment. Sampled microparticles were divided into fragments and fibres, the latter defined as those with cylindrical shape and length to diameter ratio >3. We showed the presence of 12 different anthropogenic polymers or groups of polymers with a predominance of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester and acrylic fibres together with an important amount of manufactured natural fibres. The smaller sampled fraction, in the 25-104 μm range, was the largest in both primary and secondary effluents. Fibres displayed lower sizes than fragments and represented less than one third of the anthropogenic particles sampled in effluents but up to 84% of heat-dried sludge. The plant showed a high efficiency (>90%) in removing microplastics from wastewater. However, the amount of anthropogenic plastics debris in the 25 μm - 50 mm range still released with the effluent amounted to 12.8 ± 6.3 particles/L, representing 300 million plastic debris per day and an approximate load of microplastics of 350 particles/m in the receiving Henares River. WWTP mixed sludge contained 183 ± 84 particles/g while heat-dried sludge bore 165 ± 37 particles/g. The sludge of the WWTP sampled in this work, would disseminate 8 × 10 plastic particles per year if improperly managed. The agricultural use of sludge as soil amendment in the area of Madrid could spread up to 10 microplastic particles in agricultural soils per year.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Tracing the fate of microplastic in wastewater treatment plant: A multi-stage analysis of treatment units and sludge

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tracked microplastics through every stage of a wastewater treatment plant and found that while treatment removes many particles from the water, most end up concentrated in the leftover sludge. Fibers and fragments were the most common shapes, made primarily of polyester and polyethylene. Since treated sludge is often spread on farmland, this creates a pathway for microplastics to enter soil and potentially the food chain.

Article Tier 2

Research Progress on Occurrence, Removal and Fate of Microplastics in WWTPs

AI summary Read the abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a major route by which microplastics reach rivers and oceans, yet they also remove a substantial portion of incoming particles. This review synthesizes data on microplastic abundance, shape, size, and polymer type across WWTP influent, effluent, and sludge, finding that fibres become proportionally more dominant in effluent while PP, PE, PA, and PET dominate throughout. Understanding WWTP performance is critical because sludge applied to farmland and treated effluent discharged to waterways both represent significant ongoing sources of microplastic contamination.

Review Tier 2

A global review of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: Understanding their occurrence, fate and impact

AI summary Read the abstract

A global review of 121 wastewater treatment plants found that microplastics are consistently present in both influent and effluent, with WWTPs acting as major conduits delivering plastics into aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. While removal efficiencies varied widely, the sludge produced by these plants represents a concentrated secondary pathway for microplastic release to land.

Article Tier 2

Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tracked microplastic particles through multiple stages of a wastewater treatment plant, finding that particles were concentrated in sludge but that a fraction passed through each treatment stage and remained in the final effluent.

Article Tier 2

Review on the occurrence and fate of microplastics in Sewage Treatment Plants

AI summary Read the abstract

This review compiled occurrence and fate data for microplastics across influent, effluent, and sludge from sewage treatment plants, finding that concentrations range up to 3,160 particles/L in raw wastewater and that treatment achieves up to 98% removal, with the retained microplastics concentrated in sludge. The authors highlight that while WWTPs protect receiving waters, sludge disposal transfers the plastic burden to soils.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper