0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge

Environmental Pollution 2019 589 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Carlos Edo, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Carlos Edo, Carlos Edo, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisco Leganés, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Carlos Edo, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisco Leganés, Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Miguel González-Pleiter Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisco Leganés, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Francisco Leganés, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Francisca Fernández‐Piñas, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Roberto Rosal, Miguel González-Pleiter

Summary

Researchers tracked microplastics through a wastewater treatment plant and found 12 different polymer types in effluents and sludge, with smaller particles (25–104 μm) most abundant and fibres displaying lower sizes than fragments. The study demonstrates that WWTPs do not fully remove microplastics and that processed sludge marketed as soil amendment carries plastic contamination.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

This work studied the occurrence of microplastics in primary and secondary effluents and mixed sludge of a WWTP as well as in processed heat-dried sludge marketed as soil amendment. Sampled microparticles were divided into fragments and fibres, the latter defined as those with cylindrical shape and length to diameter ratio >3. We showed the presence of 12 different anthropogenic polymers or groups of polymers with a predominance of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester and acrylic fibres together with an important amount of manufactured natural fibres. The smaller sampled fraction, in the 25-104 μm range, was the largest in both primary and secondary effluents. Fibres displayed lower sizes than fragments and represented less than one third of the anthropogenic particles sampled in effluents but up to 84% of heat-dried sludge. The plant showed a high efficiency (>90%) in removing microplastics from wastewater. However, the amount of anthropogenic plastics debris in the 25 μm - 50 mm range still released with the effluent amounted to 12.8 ± 6.3 particles/L, representing 300 million plastic debris per day and an approximate load of microplastics of 350 particles/m in the receiving Henares River. WWTP mixed sludge contained 183 ± 84 particles/g while heat-dried sludge bore 165 ± 37 particles/g. The sludge of the WWTP sampled in this work, would disseminate 8 × 10 plastic particles per year if improperly managed. The agricultural use of sludge as soil amendment in the area of Madrid could spread up to 10 microplastic particles in agricultural soils per year.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper