0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastic in Water and Wastewater

2020

AI summary Read the abstract

This engineering thesis addressed three challenges in microplastic contamination research: the lack of standardized sampling and detection methods for water and wastewater, the development of improved removal technologies, and the assessment of ecological impacts on aquatic organisms. Researchers found that the absence of methodological consensus was the largest barrier to generating comparable data across studies. The work supports development of standardized frameworks for quantifying microplastic loads in urban water systems.

Study Type Environmental

This thesis addresses three challenges related to the microplastic contamination in water and wastewater treatment plants. The first challenge is the multiple methodologies used to collect, quantify, and characterize microplastics in both wastewater and drinking water. Our study shows a lack of consensus regarding the techniques used at all of the stages (from collection to characterization) required for the quantification of microplastics in urban water systems. This represents a barrier to accurately determine the loads of microplastic contamination and to the comparison of the results obtained among different studies. Our results indicate large discrepancies in the concentrations reported in both wastewater effluents and drinking water, microplastic characteristics (i.e. size, color, shape, and composition), and quality control and assurance procedures. Finally, we propose the use of a ranking system that can stimulate researchers to reduce the deficit of studies using the results obtained in the high-ranked papers. The second challenge is the large contribution of wastewater treatment plants in discharging microplastic into natural bodies of water. This study evaluated the use of electrocoagulation for the removal of microplastics from both synthetic wastewater solutions and real wastewater effluents. The experiments were performed in batch reactors using commercial polyester microplastic glitter. The results indicate removal efficiencies in synthetic wastewater ranging between 98% and 99% using initial pH between 4 and 7 and applying current densities of 2.88 mA/cm2 and 8.07 mA/cm2, respectively. When real wastewater effluent was used, electrocoagulation removed 96.5% of MPs, 92.2% of COD, and 88.8% of fecal coliform colonies using the best conditions found for synthetic wastewater. The third challenge is the use of model particles to study the microplastic contamination in aquatic environments. Our study used glitter as a model for microplastic laboratory testing due to their diversity in sizes, shapes and composite composition. This study characterized the physical and chemical properties of different size classes and colors of commercial microplastic glitters; and tests the weathering effects on them by simulating their degradability in synthetic wastewater performed in batch reactors. The results indicate that size, composition and structure of the particles lead to different behavior during weathering tests. Delamination, cracks and breaking off were observed in the large particles, while no physical changes were observed for the small particles. However, titanium oxide was released onto the small particles’ surface, indicating that this metal oxide became more reactive during the weathering process. The addition of titanium oxide to those particles. In conclusion, this study provides an overview of the MP contamination in water and wastewater and presents some challenges in the research field while providing possible solutions and suggests recommendations for further research.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A Critical Review of Extraction and Identification Methods of Microplastics in Wastewater and Drinking Water

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review of methods for detecting microplastics in wastewater and drinking water identifies major inconsistencies in sample collection, processing, and characterization across studies, making it difficult to compare reported concentrations. A five-criteria ranking system is proposed to evaluate the quality and completeness of microplastics studies.

Article Tier 2

A review of microplastics measuring methods in water and wastewater bodies

AI summary Read the abstract

This review covers the wide variety of methods used to measure microplastics in water and wastewater, comparing their advantages and limitations. The authors note that lack of standardized methods makes it difficult to compare results across studies and call for international consensus on measurement protocols.

Article Tier 2

Techniques for Microplastics Detection in Urban Water Systems

AI summary Read the abstract

This review chapter surveys the methods used to detect microplastics in urban water systems including drinking water, wastewater, and sediment, covering sample collection, purification, and identification techniques. It highlights the lack of standardized methods as a major barrier to comparing contamination data across cities and countries.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Urban Stormwater: Sampling and Separation Method

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed and tested sampling and separation methods for detecting microplastics in urban stormwater runoff, an important but understudied pathway for plastic contamination of surface waters. The study helps establish standardized protocols for monitoring microplastics in stormwater systems.

Article Tier 2

Aquatic Microplastic Research—A Critique and Suggestions for the Future

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review argues that microplastic research lacks standardized collection and analysis methods, making it impossible to compare data across studies. The author calls for chemical identification of polymer types, whole-water sampling, and a focus on ecological impacts rather than just documenting presence.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper