We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
From DPSIR the DAPSI(W)R(M) Emerges… a Butterfly – ‘protecting the natural stuff and delivering the human stuff’
Summary
This review presents the DAPSI(W)R(M) framework as an evolution of the DPSIR model for analyzing social-ecological systems, developed through decades of practical implementation to better capture human-ecosystem interactions and support environmental management decisions.
The complexity of interactions and feedbacks between human activities and ecosystems can make the analysis of such social-ecological systems intractable. In order to provide a common means to understand and analyse the links between social and ecological process within these systems, a range of analytical frameworks have been developed and adopted. Following decades of practical experience in implementation, the Driver Pressure State Impact Response (DPSIR) conceptual framework has been adapted and re-developed to become the D(A)PSI(W)R(M). This paper describes in detail the D(A)PSI(W)R(M) and its development from the original DPSIR conceptual frame. Despite its diverse application and demonstrated utility, a number of inherent shortcomings are identified. In particular the DPSIR model family tend to be best suited to individual environmental pressures and human activities and their resulting environmental problems, having a limited focus on the supply and demand of benefits from nature. We present a derived framework, the “Butterfly”, a more holistic approach designed to expand the concept. The “Butterfly” model, moves away from the centralised accounting framework approach while more-fully incorporating the complexity of social and ecological systems, and the supply and demand of ecosystem services, which are central to human-environment interactions.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Chains of Social Sustainability and the Potential of the DPSIR Framework
Researchers examined whether the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, established for environmental sustainability analysis, can be usefully extended to structure social sustainability issues. Using child labour as a case study, they demonstrate that the DPSIR framework can distinguish drivers, pressures, states, impacts, and responses in social problem domains.
The Marine Plastic Litter Issue: A Social-Economic Analysis
Using the DPSIR framework, this study analyzed marine plastic litter pollution as a social-economic issue, finding that fewer than 10 peer-reviewed studies had applied this policy-relevant analytical model to ocean plastics, and identifying management response gaps in food security, transport, and shelter contexts.
A DPSIR Assessment on Ecosystem Services Challenges in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Coping with the Impacts of Sand Mining
Researchers applied the DPSIR (Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) framework to assess the ecosystem services challenges posed by intensive sand mining in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. The analysis identified urbanisation-driven sand demand as the primary driver, with the resulting river bed incision and sediment deficit threatening delta biodiversity, agricultural productivity, and coastal stability.
Evaluation of Sustainable Development of an Agricultural Economy Based on the DPSIR Model
This study applied the DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impacts-Responses) model to evaluate the sustainable development of the agricultural economy in China. The analysis identified economic growth pressures and environmental degradation as interconnected challenges. Frameworks like DPSIR help policymakers design responses that address root causes of agricultural pollution, including plastic mulch use.
Re-imagining the driver–pressure–state–impact–response framework from an equity and inclusive development perspective
This paper critiques the widely used DPSIR environmental policy framework for overlooking social justice and equity, arguing that environmental burdens fall disproportionately on vulnerable communities. The critique is relevant to microplastic pollution, which often affects lower-income and coastal communities most severely.