We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Chains of Social Sustainability and the Potential of the DPSIR Framework
Summary
Researchers examined whether the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework, established for environmental sustainability analysis, can be usefully extended to structure social sustainability issues. Using child labour as a case study, they demonstrate that the DPSIR framework can distinguish drivers, pressures, states, impacts, and responses in social problem domains.
ABSTRACT For more than 20 years, the Driver‐Pressure‐State‐Impact‐Response (DPSIR) framework has contributed to clarifying causal chains for environmental sustainability issues. This study aims to answer the question of whether the framework can extend its usefulness to structuring social sustainability issues, to which it has not been applied so far. It shows that based on some simple conceptual foundations, it is possible to distinguish between drivers of social problems, pressure, social states, impacts and responses. Using the case of child labour, the study demonstrates how the DPSIR framework and the social pillar of sustainability can structure and clarify causal chains. The findings highlight the untapped potential of applying the DPSIR framework to social issues.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Evaluation of Sustainable Development of an Agricultural Economy Based on the DPSIR Model
This study applied the DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impacts-Responses) model to evaluate the sustainable development of the agricultural economy in China. The analysis identified economic growth pressures and environmental degradation as interconnected challenges. Frameworks like DPSIR help policymakers design responses that address root causes of agricultural pollution, including plastic mulch use.
Re-imagining the driver–pressure–state–impact–response framework from an equity and inclusive development perspective
This paper critiques the widely used DPSIR environmental policy framework for overlooking social justice and equity, arguing that environmental burdens fall disproportionately on vulnerable communities. The critique is relevant to microplastic pollution, which often affects lower-income and coastal communities most severely.
From DPSIR the DAPSI(W)R(M) Emerges… a Butterfly – ‘protecting the natural stuff and delivering the human stuff’
This review presents the DAPSI(W)R(M) framework as an evolution of the DPSIR model for analyzing social-ecological systems, developed through decades of practical implementation to better capture human-ecosystem interactions and support environmental management decisions.
The Marine Plastic Litter Issue: A Social-Economic Analysis
Using the DPSIR framework, this study analyzed marine plastic litter pollution as a social-economic issue, finding that fewer than 10 peer-reviewed studies had applied this policy-relevant analytical model to ocean plastics, and identifying management response gaps in food security, transport, and shelter contexts.
Beach pollution from marine litter: Analysis with the DPSIR framework (driver, pressure, state, impact, response) in Tuscany, Italy
Researchers applied the DPSIR environmental analysis framework to understand the accumulation of litter and waste on beaches in Tuscany, Italy, finding that coastal ocean currents — not local waterways — were the main source of beach debris, while local sewage contaminated the sand with fecal bacteria at levels posing moderate health risks. The study demonstrates how a systems-level approach can help beach managers identify the true causes of marine litter and evaluate the effectiveness of existing cleanup measures.