0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Biological Responses to Climate Change and Nanoplastics Are Altered in Concert: Full-Factor Screening Reveals Effects of Multiple Stressors on Primary Producers

Environmental Science & Technology 2020 87 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Yamin Yang, Yawen Guo, Anna O'Brien, Tiago F. Lins, Chelsea M. Rochman, David Sinton

Summary

Using high-throughput screening of a freshwater green alga, researchers tested how nanoplastics interact with multiple climate change stressors (temperature, CO2, pH, UV), finding that nanoplastics combined with warming or UV caused greater harm than either alone, and that climate change will likely amplify nanoplastic toxicity.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

While the combined presence of global climate change and nanosized plastic particle (i.e., nanoplastic) pollution is clear, the potential for interactions between climate-change-shifting environmental parameters and nanoplastics is largely unknown. Here, we aim to understand how nanoplastics will affect species in concert with climate change in freshwater ecosystems. We utilized a high-throughput full-factorial experimental system and the model photosynthetic microorganism Scenedesmus obliquus to capture the complexity of interacting environmental stressors, including CO2, temperature, light, and nanoplastics. Under a massive number of conditions (2000+), we consistently found concentration-dependent inhibition of algal growth in the presence of polystyrene nanoparticles, highlighting a threat to primary productivity in aquatic ecosystems. Our high-treatment experiment also identified crucial interactions between nanoplastics and climate change. We found that relatively low temperature and ambient CO2 exacerbated damage induced by nanoplastics, while elevated CO2 and warmer temperatures reflecting climate change scenarios somewhat attenuated nanoplastic toxicity. Further, we revealed that nanoplastics may modulate light responses, implying that risks of nanoplastic pollution may also depend on local irradiation conditions. Our study highlights the coupled impacts of nanoplastics and climate change, as well as the value of full-factorial screening in predicting biological responses to multifaceted global change.

Share this paper