0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Single-Pot Method for the Collection and Preparation of Natural Water for Microplastic Analyses: Microplastics in the Mississippi River System during and after Historic Flooding

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2020 99 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a single-pot collection and preparation method for microplastic analysis in natural water using mason jars, applied it to surface grab samples from the Mississippi River system during and after historic 2019 flooding, and quantified microplastics larger than approximately 30 micrometers using Nile red fluorescence detection.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

We describe a simple single-pot method for collection and preparation of natural water for microplastic analyses. The method prepares samples in the same vessel (mason jars) that they are collected in right up until the microplastics are transferred onto filters or spectroscopic windows for analyses. The method minimized contamination, degradation, and losses, while increasing recoveries and throughput when compared with conventional sieving. We applied it to surface grab samples collected from the Mississippi River and its major tributaries during and after historic flooding in 2019. Microplastics (>~30 µm) were quantified using Nile red fluorescence detection, and a small subset of samples were identified by micro-Fourier transform infrared imaging spectroscopy. Concentrations were lower during the flooding, likely due to dilution. Concentrations ranged from approximately 14 microplastics/L in the Tennessee River during flooding to approximately 83 microplastics/L in the Ohio River during low-flow (summer) conditions. Loads of microplastics tended to increase downriver and ranged from approximately 87 to approximately 129 trillion microplastics/d near New Orleans. Most of the microplastics (>60%) were in the lower size fraction (~30-90 µm) and consisted primarily of fragments (~85%), followed by fibers (~8%) and beads (~7%), with polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyacrylate as the primary microplastic types. Overall, we demonstrate that the single-pot method is effective and versatile and, because it uses relatively inexpensive and easily assembled materials, can be adapted for microplastic surveys worldwide, especially those involving sample collection by volunteers from the community and schools. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:986-995. © 2020 SETAC.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Identification and quantification of microplastic particles in drinking water treatment sludge as an integrative approach to determine microplastic abundance in a freshwater river

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used drinking water treatment plant sludge as an integrative sampler to estimate microplastic abundance in a freshwater river over extended periods, capturing larger water volumes than conventional net or filtration methods. The approach improves representativeness of microplastic occurrence data in flowing water bodies.

Article Tier 2

Sample preparation methods for the analysis of microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: a review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed 150 studies on freshwater microplastic sampling to assess which preparation and separation methods are most reliable, finding wide variation in techniques and calling for more standardized approaches so data from different ecosystems can be meaningfully compared.

Article Tier 2

Assessing Microplastic Debris in the Mississippi River Watershed Across Space, Time, and Varying Flow Conditions

AI summary Read the abstract

Microplastic concentrations in the Mississippi River watershed averaged approximately 80 particles per liter—with fibers comprising 98% of debris—and annual loads to the Gulf of Mexico were estimated at over 30 quadrillion particles. The Mississippi represents one of the largest conduits of plastic pollution from land to ocean, underscoring the need for upstream intervention to protect marine environments.

Article Tier 2

Is There a Difference in Yield? A Comparative Analysis of Microplastics Sampling Techniques in River Water with a Low-Velocity Flow

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared three microplastic sampling techniques in low-velocity river water, quantifying differences in particle abundance and characteristics to evaluate which method most accurately captures microplastic concentrations in surface water environments.

Article Tier 2

Identification and Quantification of Microplastic Pollution in Water Samples and Four Species of Fish from the Mississippi River

AI summary Read the abstract

Microplastics were found in water samples and in four fish species from the Mississippi River, the largest North American river draining a densely populated watershed. The findings confirm that one of the world's major river systems is contaminated with microplastics, which are likely entering the Gulf of Mexico.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper