We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Monitoring marine plastics – will we know if we are making a difference?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review assessed whether existing monitoring frameworks in South Africa can detect meaningful changes in marine plastic abundance, concluding that detecting trends in floating microplastics is difficult due to high spatial and temporal variability, while beach debris monitoring offers more tractable baselines.
In the context of marine anthropogenic debris management, monitoring is essential to assess whether mitigation measures to reduce the amounts of waste plastic entering the environment are being effective. In South Africa, baselines against which changes can be assessed include data from the 1970s to the 1990s on microplastics floating at sea, on macro- and microplastic beach debris, and interactions with biota. However, detecting changes in the abundance of microplastics at sea is complicated by high spatial and temporal heterogeneity in net samples. Beach debris data are easier to gather, but their interpretation is complicated by the dynamic nature of debris fluxes on beaches and the increase in beach cleaning effort over time. Sampling plastic ingested by biota is a powerful approach, because animals that retain ingested plastic for protracted periods integrate plastics over space and time, but there are ethical issues to using biota as bioindicators, particularly for species that require destructive sampling (e.g. turtles, seabirds). Bioindicators could be established among fish and invertebrates, but there are technical challenges with sampling microplastics smaller than 1 mm. Fine-scale debris accumulation on beaches provides an index of macroplastic abundance in coastal waters, and offers a practical way to track changes in the amounts and composition of debris in coastal waters. However, upstream flux measures (i.e. in catchments, rivers and storm-water run-off) provide a more direct assessment of mitigation measures for land-based sources. Similarly, monitoring refuse returned to port by vessels is the best way to ensure compliance with legislation prohibiting the dumping of plastics at sea. Significance: Monitoring is required to assess whether mitigation measures to reduce waste plastics at sea are making a difference. Monitoring the leakage of plastic from land-based sources is best addressed on land (e.g. in storm drains and river run-off) before the plastic reaches the sea. Illegal dumping from ships is best addressed by monitoring the use of port waste reception facilities. Sampling plastic ingested by biota is a powerful approach, using fish and invertebrates as bioindicators for larger microplastic fragments.
More Papers Like This
Are litter, plastic and microplastic quantities increasing in the ocean?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review of marine litter monitoring trends found that plastic amounts are increasing in some remote regions but trends are inconsistent globally, and that gaps in standardization and monitoring programs make it difficult to validate model predictions of increasing ocean plastic loads.
A review of the environments, biota, and methods used in microplastics research in South Africa
AI summary Read the abstract
This review assesses the current state of microplastic research in South Africa, finding that while the country leads the African continent in publications, many studies use inconsistent methods that limit comparability. The authors call for a standardized national approach to microplastic sampling and analysis, noting that terrestrial and atmospheric environments remain largely uninvestigated.
The transport and fate of marine plastics in South Africa and adjacent oceans
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the transport pathways and fate of marine plastic pollution in South Africa and adjacent oceans, finding that while South Africa is considered a major plastic emitter, beach standing stocks are lower than global model predictions, suggesting much plastic is transported elsewhere or buried.
The Occurrence and Fate of Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants in South Africa and the Degradation of Microplastics in Aquatic Environments—A Critical Review
AI summary Read the abstract
A review of microplastic research in South Africa reveals a critical data gap: despite the country generating around 120 million tons of waste annually, there is almost no published information on microplastic concentrations in its wastewater treatment plants or freshwater systems. The authors argue that urgent monitoring is needed to support effective policy, given that South Africa's infrastructure is under increasing pressure from urbanization and industrialization.
Modelling the accumulation and transport of floating marine micro-plastics around South Africa.
AI summary Read the abstract
Numerical particle tracking models were used to simulate the pathways, transport, and accumulation of floating microplastics around the South African coastline. The model provides the first quantitative estimates of how different plastic densities and sizes distribute around South Africa's marine environment, identifying accumulation hotspots.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.