0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A review of the environments, biota, and methods used in microplastics research in South Africa

South African Journal of Science 2024 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Heinrich T.J. Dahms, Richard Greenfield

Summary

This review assesses the current state of microplastic research in South Africa, finding that while the country leads the African continent in publications, many studies use inconsistent methods that limit comparability. The authors call for a standardized national approach to microplastic sampling and analysis, noting that terrestrial and atmospheric environments remain largely uninvestigated.

Microplastics are small plastic materials often defined as those between 5 mm and 0.05 mm in size. Microplastics can have toxicological impacts on various biota, from gut blockages to the transport or leaching of toxicants used in their production or absorbed from the surrounding environment. Although microplastic research has increased significantly, microplastic research in Africa lags behind that of developed countries. South Africa is the African nation with the highest number of microplastic publications. We aimed to determine the current state of microplastic research in South Africa. A total of 46 publications on microplastics in South Africa have been produced. However, many of these publications use methods that might not be accurate in determining holistic descriptions of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Similarly, many ecologically relevant environments and species have not been investigated for microplastics in the country, including any atmospheric or terrestrial environment. We conclude that, although the research being produced in South Africa can be considered adequate, a singular standard method for sampling and assessing microplastics in South African environments is required. The production of such a standard method would be critical to use as a monitoring tool to determine and compare microplastic abundances across the country and globally.

Share this paper