0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Biodegradable Plastic Mulches in the Agricultural Sector

HortTechnology 2020 16 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kuan‐Ju Chen, Thomas L. Marsh, Suzette P. Galinato Thomas L. Marsh, Peter R. Tozer, Hayley H. Chouinard, Hayley H. Chouinard, Thomas L. Marsh, Suzette P. Galinato

Summary

Researchers used discrete choice experiments with agricultural stakeholders in the Pacific Northwest to assess willingness to pay for attributes of biodegradable plastic mulches as alternatives to polyethylene mulches. Results showed that price premium opportunities for crops grown, soil health improvements, and reduced field residue were the most valued attributes, with heterogeneity in preferences between farmers and non-farmers.

Polymers

To mitigate the environmental harm associated with the disposal of polyethylene (PE) (plastic) mulches after use—incineration, dumping at landfills, tilling into the soil, and onsite stockpiling—biodegradable plastic mulches (BDMs) are proposed as an environmentally friendly alternative. These mulches are designed to degrade in the field, thereby reducing negative impacts. We conducted discrete choice experiments to evaluate willingness to pay (WTP) for BDM attributes using data collected from a survey of stakeholders in the agricultural sector (e.g., farmers, crop advisors, educators, and others) in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Results obtained using a mixed logit model show that respondents assign the greatest value to BDM attributes that provide a price premium opportunity for the product grown, improve soil health, or reduce field-borne residue, thereby enhancing sustainability. We found heterogeneity in preferences for the attributes of plastic residue and soil health: the cost of BDMs is more important to nonfarmers and noncrop advisors, whereas soil health is more of a concern for crop advisors. In addition, respondents who are less risk averse and less sensitive to cost are more willing to adopt BDMs. Results from this study have implications regarding the best ways to introduce and support sustainable practices as a part of green technology in the agricultural sector, particularly for new BDM products.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper