0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S

International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020 53 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Magdalena Zaborowska, Jadwiga Wyszkowska, Agata Borowik

Summary

Bisphenol A (BPA) and two of its substitutes — bisphenol F and bisphenol S — all disrupt soil microbial communities when present in soil. Since BPF and BPS are marketed as safer alternatives to BPA, this finding suggests they may not be as benign as assumed.

The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)-analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzymatic activity. The following parameters were determined in soil uncontaminated and contaminated with BPA, BPF, and BPS: the count of eleven groups of microorganisms, colony development (CD) index, microorganism ecophysiological diversity (EP) index, genetic diversity of bacteria and activity of dehydrogenases (Deh), urease (Ure), catalase (Cat), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Bisphenols A, S and F significantly disrupted the soil homeostasis. BPF is regarded as the most toxic, followed by BPS and BPA. BPF and BPS reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased that of Actinobacteria. Unique types of bacteria were identified as well as the characteristics of each bisphenol: Lysobacter, Steroidobacter, Variovorax, Mycoplana, for BPA, Caldilinea, Arthrobacter, Cellulosimicrobium and Promicromonospora for BPF and Dactylosporangium Geodermatophilus, Sphingopyxis for BPS. Considering the strength of a negative impact of bisphenols on the soil biochemical activity, they can be arranged as follows: BPS > BPF > BPA. Urease and arylsulphatase proved to be the most susceptible and dehydrogenases the least susceptible to bisphenols pressure, regardless of the study duration.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Transport of Bisphenol A, Bisphenol S and three Bisphenol F isomers in saturated soils

Researchers studied how Bisphenol A and its substitutes BPS and BPF move through soil in column experiments, finding all three compounds can leach into groundwater. These plastic-derived endocrine-disrupting chemicals can adsorb to microplastics in soil, with implications for water quality and human exposure.

Article Tier 2

Bisphenol S degradation in soil and the dynamics of microbial community associated with degradation

Bisphenol S degraded rapidly in soil (up to 98.9% removal within 32 days) but the presence of polystyrene microplastics altered the composition of BPS-degrading microbial communities. BPS exposure reduced overall soil microbial diversity while enriching Proteobacteria capable of aromatic compound degradation, suggesting MPs affect the microbial ecology of organic contaminant breakdown.

Article Tier 2

Bisphenols—A Threat to the Natural Environment

This review examines the environmental and health threats posed by bisphenol A (BPA) and its replacements, bisphenol F and bisphenol S, which were introduced as safer alternatives. However, because these substitutes have similar chemical structures to BPA, they may pose comparable risks to human health and the environment, including hormone disruption. The study is relevant to microplastics research because bisphenols are common additives in plastics that can leach out as plastics break down into microparticles.

Article Tier 2

Insights into the Adverse Effects of Bisphenol A on the Environment and Human Health

Researchers investigated the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA), its replacement bisphenol F (BPF), and their combination on primary producers, finding that both compounds harm eukaryotic green algae and raising concerns about the safety of BPA substitutes.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of microbial populations in plastic–soil systems after exposure to high poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) load using high-resolution molecular technique

Researchers examined how high concentrations of the biodegradable plastic PBSA affect soil microbial communities, finding that PBSA exposure significantly altered microbial diversity and community composition, with certain bacteria enriched as potential plastic degraders.

Share this paper