0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Close Encounters - Microplastic availability to pelagic amphipods in sub-Antarctic and Antarctic surface waters

Environment International 2020 108 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Claire M. Waluda, Matthew Cole, Kirstie Jones-Williams, Kirstie Jones-Williams, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Kirstie Jones-Williams, Kirstie Jones-Williams, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Claire M. Waluda, Claire M. Waluda, Claire M. Waluda, Kirstie Jones-Williams, Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Claire M. Waluda, Claire M. Waluda, Gabriele Stowasser, Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Clara Manno, Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Claire M. Waluda, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Matthew Cole, Tamara S. Galloway Tamara S. Galloway

Summary

Researchers sampled plastic debris from sub-Antarctic to Antarctic Peninsula surface waters during austral summer 2018, finding that 45.6% of isolated particles were sampling contamination from the ship itself, and true environmental concentrations were significantly low at 0.013 particles per cubic meter. Despite low concentrations, modeled encounter rates indicated that pelagic amphipods could still come into contact with microplastics, underscoring ecological risk even in remote polar waters.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

This study investigated the distribution of plastic debris from the Atlantic portion of the Sub-Antarctic to the Antarctic Peninsula. This region is home to some of the highest concentrations of zooplankton biomass but is also threatened by increasing shipping traffic from fishing and the growing tourism market. Samples were collected using a surface-towed neuston net during the Austral summer 2018, aboard the RRS James Clark Ross. Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry it was found that 45.6% of the plastic particles isolated from seawater samples were sampling contamination, originating predominantly from the ship. Of the remaining particles, both low density (polyethylene, polypropylene) and high-density (phenoxy and epoxy resins) polymers were found in the surface water suggesting both long-range and local sources of origin. Whilst we found that micro and mesoplastic concentrations in seawater were significantly low (0.013 ± 0.005n/m<sup>3</sup>) compared to global averages, they were higher along the Antarctic Peninsula than the open ocean (Sub-Antarctic) stations. The potential availability of micro and mesoplastics (MP) to pelagic amphipods was explored, using an observed encounter rate (OER) and a possible encounter rate (PER). The total OER (0.8%) was higher than the PER (0.15%), suggesting that even at low concentrations, microplastics are encountered, and potentially consumed, by amphipods. This study highlights the need to prioritise regions of high zooplankton abundance and to investigate both water and biota to build up a picture of plastic pollution and its potential interaction with the Antarctic Ecosystem.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper