0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Effects of Polyester Microfibers on Microphytobenthos and Sediment-Dwelling Infauna

Environmental Science & Technology 2020 66 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Giovanni Coco, Giovanni Coco, Giovanni Coco, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Julie A. Hope, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush

Summary

Researchers examined the effects of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microfibers on microphytobenthos, a deposit-feeding bivalve (Macomona liliana), and sediment nutrient cycling across six concentration levels in controlled sediment chambers. The study found that PET microfibers disrupted benthic community structure and altered sediment nutrient fluxes at environmentally relevant concentrations.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microfibers often dominate sediment microplastic samples, but little is known about their ecological effects on benthic organisms and functions. Polyethylene terephthalate) (PET) microfibers were added to 36 sediment chambers at six concentrations (0-0.5 g kg<sup>-1</sup> sediment) to assess the effects on microphytobenthos (MPB), a key deposit-feeding bivalve, <i>Macomona liliana</i>, and sediment nutrient pools. MPB photosynthesis was promoted in 18 chambers through a 12 h light/dark cycle. Another 18 chambers were maintained under dark conditions to inhibit photosynthesis. After 35 days of MPB growth and stabilization, four <i>M. liliana</i> were added to each chamber for a further 40 days. MPB biomass and composition were examined alongside <i>M. liliana</i> biochemical and behavioral properties and porewater dissolved inorganic nutrient concentrations. Increasing microfibers resulted in lower MPB biomass, fewer diatom-associated fatty acids (FAs), and an increase in cyanobacteria. The changes in MPB coincided with up to 75% lower energy reserves and reduced burrowing activity in <i>M. liliana</i>. In the light, nitrate + nitrate (NO<i><sub>x</sub></i>) was significantly elevated and related to <i>M. liliana</i> and MPB biochemical properties. Ammoniu (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) concentrations increased but were variable in both the light and the dark. Our results suggest that increasing microfiber concentrations influence the interactions between <i>M. liliana</i> and MPB and affect biogeochemical processing in coastal marine sediments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper