0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Risk assessment of added chemicals in plastics in the Danish marine environment

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2020 20 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Patrik Fauser, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Patrik Fauser, Jakob Strand, Patrik Fauser, Patrik Fauser, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Patrik Fauser, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Patrik Fauser, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Patrik Fauser, Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Jakob Strand, Katrin Vorkamp Katrin Vorkamp

Summary

Researchers conducted a risk assessment of chemical additives and monomers present in plastics ingested by marine organisms in the Danish marine environment, defining eight cases based on polymer types and product groups representing high-risk exposure scenarios. Risk Quotients were calculated to identify which plastic-associated chemicals posed the greatest hazard to marine organisms.

A risk assessment framework for direct exposure of residual additives and monomers present in ingested plastic particles, including microplastics, in the Danish marine environment, was presented. Eight cases of different polymer types and product groups were defined that represent the most significant exposures, and thus potential high-risk cases, towards marine organisms. Risk Quotients (RQ) were calculated for three trophic levels, i.e. pelagic/planktonic zooplankton: copepod, benthopelagic fish: Atlantic cod and seabird: northern fulmar. European and Danish Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) values were used as Predicted No-Effect Concentrations (PNEC). RQ larger than unity, indicating potential risks, were found for copepod and cod (pelagic community) and the flame-retardant pentabromodiphenyl ether (PeBDE) used in polyurethane (PUR), the biocide tributyltin (TBT) present as impurity in polyvinylchloride (PVC) and PUR, and the flame-retardant hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) used in expanded polystyrene (EPS). A potential risk was found for fulmar (secondary poisoning) and PeBDE used in PUR.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper