0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

London's river of plastic: High levels of microplastics in the Thames water column

The Science of The Total Environment 2020 122 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katharine H. Rowley, Katharine H. Rowley, Paul F. Clark, Paul F. Clark, Paul F. Clark, Paul F. Clark, Anna-Christina Cucknell, Anna-Christina Cucknell, Brian D. Smith, Brian D. Smith, Brian D. Smith, David Morritt Paul F. Clark, David Morritt, David Morritt David Morritt David Morritt David Morritt Paul F. Clark, David Morritt, David Morritt, David Morritt, David Morritt, David Morritt David Morritt David Morritt, David Morritt, David Morritt

Summary

Microplastic concentrations in the River Thames water column were among the highest recorded globally, at about 25 particles per cubic meter at Putney and 14 at Greenwich, with polyethylene and polypropylene the dominant types. Concentrations varied significantly by site, tide, depth, and season, reflecting the dynamic nature of plastic pollution in a major urban river.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

This opportunistic study focussed on the quantification of microplastics in the River Thames water column, the catchment responsible for draining Greater London. Two sites on the tidal Thames were sampled; one upstream of the City of London at Putney, and the other downstream at Greenwich. Water column samples were collected from June through to October 2017, being taken on the ebb and flood tides, at the surface and a depth of 2 m. Microplastics (excluding microfibres) were identified to test whether the load varied between the two sites in relation to tide, depth and season. Secondary microplastics, films and fragments, contributed 93.5% of all those found at Putney and Greenwich. Site, tide, depth and month affected density, with the combined interaction of month and site found to have the greatest influence on microplastics. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis showed that polyethylene and polypropylene were the most common polymers collected from the River, suggesting broken down packaging was the primary source of microplastics in these samples. Excluding microfibres, the estimate of microplastics in the water column was 24.8 per m at Putney and 14.2 per m at Greenwich. These levels are comparable to some of the highest recorded in the world.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper