0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Particles under stress: Ultrasonication causes size and recovery rate artifacts with soil derived POM, but not with microplastics

2020 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Frederick Büks, Gilles Kayser, Antonia Zieger, Friederike Lang, Martin Kaupenjohann

Summary

This study investigated whether ultrasonication, commonly used in soil organic matter fractionation, artifacts the size distribution and recovery rate of both soil particulate organic matter and microplastics. Researchers found that ultrasonication can break up soil organic matter but does not significantly affect microplastic recovery or size distribution.

Polymers

Abstract. The breakdown of soil aggregates and the extraction of particulate organic matter (POM) by ultrasonication and density fractionation is a method widely used in soil organic matter (SOM) analyses. It has recently also been used for the extraction of microplastic from soil samples. However, the investigation of some POM physiochemical properties and ecological functions might be biased, if particles are comminuted during the treatment. In this work, different types of POM, which are representative for different terrestrial ecosystems and anthropogenic influences, were tested for their structural stability in face of ultrasonication in a range of 0 to 500 J ml−1. The occluded particulate organic matter (oPOM) of an agricultural and forest soil as well as pyrochar showed a significant reduction of particle size at ≥ 50 J ml−1 by an average factor of 1.37 ± 0.16 and a concurrent reduction of recovery rates by an average of 21.7 ± 10.7 % when being extracted. Our results imply that ultrasonication causes an imitated carry-over of POM to more strongly bound fractions or to the mineral-associated organic matter (MOM) due to enhanced attraction to the mineral phase, which could e.g. lead to a false estimation of physical stabilization. In contrast, neither fresh nor weathered polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) microplastics showed a reduction of particle size or the recovery rate after application of ultrasound. We conclude that ultrasonication applied to soils has no impact on microplastic size distribution and thus provides a valuable tool for the assessment of microplastics in soils and soil aggregates.

Share this paper