0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Response of coral reef dinoflagellates to nanoplastics under experimental conditions

2020 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Christina Ripken, Konstantin Khalturin, Konstantin Khalturin, Eiichi Shoguchi Eiichi Shoguchi

Summary

Researchers exposed symbiotic dinoflagellates from coral reefs to polystyrene nanoplastics and found that cell growth and aggregation were significantly reduced after 10 days. The findings suggest that nanoplastic pollution could harm the tiny algae that are essential to coral reef health, with potential consequences for reef ecosystems.

Polymers

Abstract Plastic products contribute heavily to anthropogenic pollution of the oceans. Small plastic particles in the micro- and nanoscale ranges have been found in all marine ecosystems, but little is known about their effects upon marine organisms. In this study we examine changes in cell growth, aggregation, and gene expression of two symbiotic dinoflagellates of the family Symbiodiniaceae, Symbiodinium tridacnidorum (clade A3) and Cladocopium sp. (clade C), under exposure to 42-nm polystyrene beads. In laboratory experiments, cell number and aggregation were reduced after 10 days of nanoplastic exposure at 0.01, 0.1, and 10 mg/L concentrations, but no clear correlation with plastic concentration was observed. Genes involved in dynein motor function were upregulated compared to control conditions, while genes related to photosynthesis, mitosis, and intracellular degradation were downregulated. Overall, nanoplastic exposure led to more genes being downregulated than upregulated and the number of genes with altered expression was larger in Cladocopium sp. than in S. tridacnidorum , suggesting different sensitivity to nanoplastic between species. Our data show that nanoplastic inhibits growth and alters aggregation properties of microalgae, which may negatively affect the uptake of these indispensable symbionts by coral reef organisms.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper