0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Aquatic toxicity of chemically defined microplastics can be explained by functional additives

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020 151 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Eva Verdejo, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Eva Verdejo, Ricardo Beiras Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Pedro Campoy-López, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Pedro Campoy-López, Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras Leticia Vidal-Liñán, Ricardo Beiras Ricardo Beiras

Summary

Researchers manufactured microplastics from four polymer types with precisely defined chemical compositions, including different additive formulations, and tested their toxicity to aquatic organisms. They found that the toxic effects of microplastics could largely be explained by the functional additives they contained rather than the base polymer itself. The study suggests that the chemical additives in plastics, not just the plastic material, are a primary driver of microplastic toxicity in aquatic environments.

A novel, systematic approach to relate plastic toxicity with chemical composition is undertaken. Using industrial methods, three petroleum-based polymers, low-density polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polyamide (PA), and the biopolymer polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) were manufactured in different formularies including conventional and alternative additives, and microplastics of two sizes (<250 and <20 µm) were obtained with the aim to relate their composition with environmental impact in aquatic environments. Internationally accepted standard tests of regulatory use with marine organisms representative of microalgae (Tisochrysis lutea population growth), crustaceans (Acartia clausi larval survival), and echinoderms (Paracentrotus lividus sea-urchin embryo test) support the following conclusions. Aquatic toxicity of microplastics made from conventional oil-based polymers is due to leaching of chemical additives, and not to ingestion of microplastics. Use of alternative formulations based on natural rather than synthetic chemical additives did not consistently reduce aquatic toxicity except for the replacement of triclosan by the alternative biocide lawsone. In contrast, the biopolymer tested, PHB, seemed to impact marine plankton through different mechanisms associated to the higher abundance of plastic particles within the nanometric range found in this resin and absent in other materials.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper