We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 micro- and nanoplastics: A first example of their accurate quantification, along with polyester (PET), in wastewater treatment plant sludges
Summary
Researchers developed a novel quantification procedure for nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 polyamide microplastics along with PET in wastewater treatment plant sludges, representing the first accurate measurement of these dominant synthetic textile microfibre polymers in sludge matrices. The procedure uses acid hydrolysis depolymerisation followed by monomer derivatisation, providing a tool to assess risks from sludge applied as agricultural soil amendment.
A novel procedure for nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 polyamide (PAs) microplastics (MPs) quantification is described for the first time. The overall procedure, including quantification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), was tested on wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) sludges. The three polymers account for the largest global share of synthetic textile microfibers, being possibly the most common MPs released upon laundering in urban wastewaters. Therefore, measuring their content in WWTP sludges may provide an accurate picture of the potential risks associated with both the inflow of these MPs in natural water bodies and the practice of using WWTP sludges as agricultural soil amendment. The novel procedure involves PAs depolymerization by acid hydrolysis followed by derivatization of the monomers 6-aminohexanoic acid (AHA) and hexamethylene diamine (HMDA) with a fluorophore. Reversed-phase HPLC analysis with fluorescence detection results in high sensitivities for both AHA (LOD = 8.85·10 mg/L, LOQ = 3.73·10 mg/L) and HMDA (LOD = 2.12·10, LOQ = 7.04·10 mg/L). PET quantification involves depolymerization, in this case by alkaline hydrolysis, followed by HPLC analysis of its comonomer terephthalic acid. Eight sludge samples from four WWTPs in Italy showed contamination in the 29.3-215.3 ppm and 10.6-134.6 ppm range for nylon 6 and nylon 6,6, respectively, and in the 520-1470 ppm range for PET.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics and microfibers in the sludge of a municipal wastewater treatment plant
Researchers monitored microplastics and synthetic microfibers in the sludge of a Spanish municipal wastewater treatment plant throughout 2015, identifying polypropylene, nylon, and polyamide among others using FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry, and noting that sludge applied as agricultural fertilizer could transfer these contaminants to crop soils.
Identification and quantification of microplastics in wastewater treatment plant effluent: Investigation of the fate and biological effects
This study identified and quantified microplastics in wastewater treatment plant effluents and sludge, finding particles in all samples with fibers being the dominant type. The research contributes to understanding how much microplastic reaches surface waters via wastewater discharge and how much is captured in sludge that is subsequently applied to agricultural land.
Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge
Researchers tracked microplastics through a wastewater treatment plant and found 12 different polymer types in effluents and sludge, with smaller particles (25–104 μm) most abundant and fibres displaying lower sizes than fragments. The study demonstrates that WWTPs do not fully remove microplastics and that processed sludge marketed as soil amendment carries plastic contamination.
[Microplastics in wastewater treatment: current status and future trends].
This review summarizes current research on microplastic occurrence, removal, and fate in wastewater treatment plants, noting that while plants capture most microplastics in activated sludge, significant numbers still escape into effluent. The sludge itself then becomes a major pathway for microplastics to enter agricultural soils when applied as fertilizer. Future treatment improvements and sludge management policies are needed to reduce these release pathways.
A novel method for the isolation, characterisation, and quantification of nanoplastic fibres released from synthetic textiles during laundering
Researchers developed a novel method for isolating, characterising, and quantifying nanoplastic fibres (NPFs) released during laundering of synthetic textiles — including acrylic, nylon, and polyester — enabling fibre size differentiation from the micro to the nano scale. The method addresses a significant gap in textile pollution research by providing a tool to study the understudied nanoplastic fraction of laundry-derived fibre emissions.