0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Degradation of common polymers in sewage sludge purification process developed for microplastic analysis

Environmental Pollution 2020 26 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Maria Clara Lessa Belone, Marika Kokko, Essi Sarlin

Summary

Researchers developed a three-step sewage sludge purification method and tested its effects on seven common plastic types. Most polymers survived largely intact, supporting the method's use for microplastic analysis, though some materials showed minor surface changes.

To enable and/or facilitate analysis of microplastics from environmental samples, a purification process is required to reduce the organic matter content. The development of such process has as one main concern, besides achieving efficient organic matter reduction, the preservation of the microplastics. In this study, a three-step method for sewage sludge purification was proposed employing sodium dodecyl sulfate and hydrogen peroxide. The effects of the purification method on seven polymers (LLDPE, HDPE, PP, PS, PET, PA66 and SBR) were evaluated in terms of mass change, surface characteristics, mechanical properties, thermal properties and functional groups change. It was also assessed how the polymers were affected by the purification chemicals without the presence of sewage sludge. The purification process led to changes in all tested plastics, but in different intensities. LLDPE, HDPE, PP, PS and PET did not suffer considerable degradation. PET was more affected by hydrolysis than oxidation. On the other hand, the integrities of PA66 and SBR were noticeably affected. The effects of the purification process were considered to be due to the plasticizer behavior of water and oxidation on PA66 and loss of filler and oxidation on SBR. For both polymers there was a reduction on the tensile strength of around 50-60% after the purification, indicating they could be prone to fragmentate into smaller pieces along the process. After purification, PA66 also started to decompose at a temperature around 10 °C lower comparing to virgin samples. Except for SBR, the presence of sewage sludge and its oxidation was more harmful to the polymers than the purification chemicals without the presence of sewage sludge. This study serves as an evaluation of the effects of the purification process on the degradation of microplastics and a methodology for such assessment when designing a purification process.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Sewage Sludge: Effects of Treatment

This study examined the effects of various sewage sludge treatment processes on microplastic content, finding that treatment methods differ substantially in their ability to reduce microplastic concentrations before sludge is disposed of or land-applied.

Article Tier 2

Combined application of analytical techniques for microplastic determination to achieve comprehensive results for sewage sludge samples

Researchers combined multiple analytical techniques for comprehensive microplastic determination in sewage sludge samples, addressing the challenge that more than 90% of microplastics entering wastewater treatment plants are retained in sludge and require robust multi-method characterization.

Article Tier 2

Effects of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge on different polymers: Perspectives on the potential of the treatment to degrade microplastics

Researchers tested whether mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge could degrade common microplastic polymers. While they observed some surface changes and degradation signs in certain plastics, the process could not comprehensively break down any of the eight polymer types tested. The study concludes that anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge, under the conditions tested, is not an effective method for eliminating microplastics before sludge is applied to soil.

Article Tier 2

Combined application of analytical techniques for microplastic determination to achieve comprehensive results for sewage sludge samples

Researchers applied a combination of complementary analytical techniques to achieve comprehensive microplastic characterization in sewage sludge samples, addressing the limitations of using single methods for such complex matrices. They found that more than 90% of microplastics entering wastewater treatment plants are retained in the resulting sludge, and that combining analytical approaches improved detection across size ranges and polymer types.

Article Tier 2

Effects of chemical pretreatments on microplastic extraction in sewage sludge and their physicochemical characteristics

This study evaluated different chemical pretreatment methods for extracting microplastics from sewage sludge, finding that some treatments can alter the physical and chemical properties of plastic particles in ways that affect identification. Choosing the right extraction method is important for accurately characterizing microplastic contamination in biosolids.

Share this paper