We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ecological risk assessment of microplastics and heavy metals in central industrial wastewater treatment plant
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers in Thailand found microplastics in both wastewater and sludge from industrial wastewater treatment plants, identifying 14 polymer types with polyethylene being the most abundant. The study assessed ecological risks of microplastics co-occurring with heavy metals in an industrial setting.
Microplastics become a big concern in environment. Their small particle size can absorb a variety of pollutants from the nearby environment when discharged into the environment, especially heavy metals. Central industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is an important source of microplastics in the environment. In this study, wastewater and sludge were collected from two industrial estates in Thailand. Wastewater was collected from 4 points i.e., influent, post grit chamber, post aeration tank, and post sedimentation tank while sludge was collected from sludge storage. Concentration of microplastics, heavy metals and heavy metals on microplastics were examined to evaluate ecological risk assessment. Based on the results, microplastics concentration in effluent and sludge were 11.04 ? 0.08 particles/L, 2,398.00 ? 11.37 particles/kg from WWTP A, while 33.53 ? 0.55 particles/L, 1,930.00 ? 7.57 particles/kg from WWTP B, respectively. In addition, main shape, size, colors, and polymer were pellet, range 100 500 ?m, white/clear, and polypropylene polymer from both sites, respectively. In terms of heavy metals, zinc was the most detected in wastewater, sludge, and on microplastics. The risk assessment was carried out. The result found that polymer risk index (H) showed 35,835 in WWTP A and 45,652 in WWTP B, which high toxic level. High risk of pollution load index (PLI) with category IV (97.82) was showed in WWTP A, while PLI of WWTP B were presented in category II (12.76). For geo-accumulation Index (Igeo), all heavy metals presented in low degree level, except Cd and Se from WWTP A presented as low toxic (0.7) and moderate toxic (1.2), respectively. Potential ecological risk (PER) of microplastics presented extreme danger (48,893 and 20,087 from WWTP A and WWTP B, respectively.), while PER of heavy metals also showed low toxic level with 70.71 and moderate toxic with 96.61 from WWTP A and WWTP B, respectively. Furthermore, PER of heavy metals on microplastics exhibited 48,936.63 and 20,183.61 from WWTP A and WWTP B, respectively, which extreme danger level.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics in industrial wastewater treatment plant: Quantification, identification and ecological risk assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers quantified microplastics in an industrial wastewater treatment plant in Thailand across wet and dry seasons, finding the highest concentrations after the aeration treatment stage. The study demonstrates that industrial wastewater treatment is an important but undermonitored pathway for microplastics entering aquatic environments.
The Abundance and Characteristics of Microplastics in Central Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in the influent and effluent of two industrial wastewater treatment plants in Thailand, finding up to 102 particles per liter in incoming wastewater. Both plants removed most microplastics through their treatment processes, but some particles were still discharged into receiving waterways.
Microplastics pollution with heavy metals in the aquaculture zone of the Chao Phraya River Estuary, Thailand
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined microplastic pollution and associated heavy metals in the aquaculture zone of the Chao Phraya River Estuary in Thailand. They found microplastics in both sediment and surface water, with fibers being the dominant shape and polyethylene the most common polymer type. The study raises concerns about the potential for microplastics to carry heavy metal contaminants into aquaculture areas, which could affect seafood safety in the region.
Coexistence of Microplastics and Heavy Metals in Wastewater Treatment Plants of Delhi, India: Occurrence, Transport, Potential Interactions, and Associated Environmental Implications
AI summary Read the abstract
A study of five Delhi wastewater treatment plants found that while they removed about 70% of microplastics by number, a substantial quantity is still discharged in treated effluent and concentrated in sludge that may reach agricultural land. Elongated fibrous microplastics were disproportionately hard to remove, and co-occurrence with heavy metals was documented, amplifying the potential toxicological impact on receiving water bodies.
First-of-Its-Kind: Nationwide meta-analysis of microplastic pollution and risk assessment in Thailand
AI summary Read the abstract
Thailand's first nationwide meta-analysis of microplastic pollution across 118 studies found the highest contamination in crustaceans and wastewater, with fibers and fragments of PET, nylon, polypropylene, and polyethylene dominating. While ecological risk was generally low except in wastewater systems, shrimp and fish showed higher microplastic susceptibility than reported in other regional studies.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.