0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Coexistence of Microplastics and Heavy Metals in Wastewater Treatment Plants of Delhi, India: Occurrence, Transport, Potential Interactions, and Associated Environmental Implications

ACS ES&T Water 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Vinay, Deepti Surana, Deepti Surana, Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Manish Kumar, Manish Kumar, Deepti Surana, Deepti Surana, Vinay, Deepti Surana, Deepti Surana, Vinay, Deepti Surana, Vivek Kumar, Manish Kumar, Manish Kumar, Deepti Surana, Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Manish Kumar, Manish Kumar, Arto Koistinen, Manish Kumar, Arto Koistinen, Manish Kumar, Jonna Helli, Jonna Helli, Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Arto Koistinen, Arto Koistinen, Manish Kumar, Pooja Ghosh, Manish Kumar, Arto Koistinen, Arto Koistinen, Vivek Kumar, Pooja Ghosh, Manish Kumar, Pooja Ghosh, Vivek Kumar, Vivek Kumar, Víctor Carrasco-Navarro Arto Koistinen, Vivek Kumar, Arto Koistinen, Arto Koistinen, Arto Koistinen, Víctor Carrasco-Navarro

Summary

A study of five Delhi wastewater treatment plants found that while they removed about 70% of microplastics by number, a substantial quantity is still discharged in treated effluent and concentrated in sludge that may reach agricultural land. Elongated fibrous microplastics were disproportionately hard to remove, and co-occurrence with heavy metals was documented, amplifying the potential toxicological impact on receiving water bodies.

Study Type Environmental

This study investigated five wastewater treatment plants operating on the activated sludge process in Delhi to assess their microplastic (MP) removal efficiencies and to investigate possible environmental implications of MP co-existence with potential toxic elements (PTEs). Results revealed that MPs decreased through successive treatment stages from 2173.3 ± 172.04 n/L to 613.33 ± 47.84 n/L by number (71.51% removal) and 0.24 ± 0.03 mg/L to 0.06 ± 0.01 mg/L by mass (75.47% removal); however, a significant fraction of MPs is still discharged via treated effluent. Elongated MPs increased in effluent proportionately (from 15% to 25%) due to their small size and higher L/D ratio. Larger MPs (>500 μm) constituted only 1.23% in raw WW, while smaller MPs (<500 μm) dominated (>98%) across all WWTPs. μ-FTIR imaging identified eight types of polymers, with polyolefins dominating in all samples, posing a greater risk due to their high interaction potential with co-contaminants. Most MPs get accumulated in sewage sludge [(52.38 ± 8.11) × 103 n/kg of d.w. SS; 6.22 ± 1.21 mg/kg] with diverse sizes and shapes, posing a considerable risk via soil amendment. SEM-EDS analysis confirmed micro-morphological changes, adsorption of PTEs, and microbial colonization. Correlation analysis highlighted MPs’ role as vector for PTEs transport; however, not all MPs are equally effective in adsorbing metals, highlighting need for further research. These findings underscore need for a multifaceted approach, combining improved WWTPs’ performance, source control and responsible consumption, policy and regulatory interventions, behavioral changes, and continuous monitoring and research.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper