We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Potential use of PET and PP as partial replacement of sand in structural concrete
Summary
Researchers tested whether PET and polypropylene plastic waste could partially replace sand in structural concrete, evaluating the physical and mechanical properties of the resulting material. Using post-consumer plastic in construction is one strategy for diverting plastic from the waste stream and preventing it from breaking down into environmental microplastics.
ABSTRACT The use of polymeric residues in the civil construction has been the target of many studies aiming to reduce the volume of post-consumer plastics in the environment. This work focuses on the viability to use polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) as partial replacement to sand in concrete. PET and PP flakes from post-consumer packings were used as light aggregate to partially replace, individually, 10% in volume of sand. The effect of adding these polymers was investigated in terms of physical, mechanical, durability and morphological properties of the concrete. Physical properties were measured in terms of water absorption, voids content and specific mass. Mechanical properties were measured in terms of compressive strength and elasticity modulus. Durability properties were measured in terms of capillarity water absorption and electrical indication of the concrete to resist to chloride ion penetration. MEV and EDS were used to carry out morphological analysis. DSC curves were carried out to evaluate thermal properties of the polymeric flakes. Contact anlge test was also performed. The partial addition of PET and PP polymers reduced the compressive strength by 20%, whilst the reduction of the elasticity modulus was 16% for PET samples, and almost insignificant for PP samples. The durability results show that the polymers contributed to increase the resistance of the samples to chloride penetration by 15% and 57%, for PET and PP samples, respectively; however, there was an increase in the voids content and water absorption. In the morphological test it is possible to observe a lower interfacial adhesion between PP and the cementions paste in comparison to PET.
Sign in to start a discussion.