0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Knowledge gaps on micro and nanoplastics and human health: A critical review

Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 2021 41 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sandra M. O’Neill, Jenny Lawler Sandra M. O’Neill, Jenny Lawler Jenny Lawler

Summary

This critical review assessed current evidence on micro- and nanoplastic exposure and human health, concluding that while humans are ubiquitously exposed via food, water, and air, the long-term health effects of chronic low-level exposure remain poorly understood.

Recent research has made it clear that humans are ubiquitously exposed to microplastics and nanoplastics (MPs/NPs) via inhalation, dermal exposure and ingestion. Global plastic production has increased considerably with 400 million tonnes of plastic produced annually while plastic waste predominantly ends up in landfill. The accumulation of plastic in our water-bodies has detrimental long-term impacts, with persistent plastics degrading into smaller microplastics and nanoplastics (MPs/NPs). The presence of MPs/NPs in many food and beverages is a stark reminder of their pervasion into every aspect of the food chain. We have yet to determine if this long-term, chronic exposure to MPs/NPs has adverse effects on human health. This review examines the evidence in the literature highlighting the challenges of performing human studies including the lack of quantitative evidence, which is needed to make realistic estimates on the level of exposure and therefore risk. While occupational exposure to synthetic fibers in textile workers has been associated with respiratory disease, lung cancer, and bowel cancer, there are no other human studies. However, there are some rodent studies highlighting adverse effects on gut homeostasis, male reproduction, F1 offspring, and inflammation. Given these findings, further studies in human populations and model systems is a priority.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper