We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Foliar uptake and leaf-to-root translocation of nanoplastics with different coating charge in maize plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers showed that nanoplastics can enter maize plants not just through roots but also through leaves, and then travel down to the roots through the plant's internal transport system. Positively charged nanoplastics stuck to leaf surfaces more readily but also caused more damage to photosynthesis and triggered stronger stress responses in the plants. This finding is important because it reveals an additional pathway for nanoplastic contamination of food crops through airborne particles landing on leaves.
Foliar uptake of nanoplastics could represent a pathway responsible for pollutant loads in crop plants, thereby posing risks to human health. To evaluate the foliar uptake, leaf-to-root translocation of nanoplastics, as well as the influences of surface charge on the above processes and physiological effects to plants, maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings were foliar exposed to carboxyl-modified polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-COOH) and amino-modified polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NH), respectively. Both PS nanoplastics could effectively accumulate on the maize leaves, accompanied by observable particle aggregation. Due to electrostatic attraction to the negatively charged cell wall, positively charged PS-NH association with the leaf surfaces was significantly more than negatively charged PS-COOH. The fraction of PS nanoplastics entry into the leaves could efficiently transfer to the vasculature mainly through stomatal opening and move down to the roots through vascular bundle. Meanwhile, the occurrence of aggregation limited the nanoplastic translocation to the roots, especially for PS-NH with larger aggregate sizes relative to PS-COOH. Compared with negatively charged PS-COOH, positively charged PS-NH treatment had a higher inhibitory effect on photosynthesis and a stronger stimulation to the activity of antioxidant systems. Overall, our findings give a scientific basis for the risk assessment of nanoplastic exposure in air-plant systems.
More Papers Like This
Toxicity Mechanisms of Nanoplastics on Crop Growth, Interference of Phyllosphere Microbes, and Evidence for Foliar Penetration and Translocation
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed tomato plants to nanoplastics with different surface charges and found that positively charged particles caused the most damage, including stunted growth, increased stress responses, and disruption of the leaf microbiome. The nanoplastics penetrated through leaves and traveled to the roots, demonstrating that atmospheric plastic pollution can contaminate crops from above. This is a concern for food safety, as nanoplastics accumulating in edible plants could be a route of human exposure.
Uptake and transport of micro/nanoplastics in terrestrial plants: Detection, mechanisms, and influencing factors
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes how micro and nanoplastics enter and move through plants, including uptake through roots and leaves via processes like endocytosis and movement through cell walls. Smaller particles penetrate more easily, and factors like surface charge and soil conditions affect how much plastic plants absorb. The findings are important because they show that crops can take up microplastics from contaminated soil, creating a potential pathway for these particles to reach the human diet.
Differentially charged nanoplastics demonstrate distinct accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed Arabidopsis thaliana plants to positively and negatively charged polystyrene nanoplastics and found that charge determined accumulation patterns, with positively charged particles penetrating deeper into root and leaf tissues than negatively charged ones.
Do differentially charged nanoplastics affect imidacloprid uptake, translocation, and metabolism in Chinese flowering cabbage?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that positively charged nanoplastics inhibited plant growth and reduced imidacloprid translocation in Chinese flowering cabbage, while negatively charged nanoplastics accelerated pesticide accumulation in shoots, revealing charge-dependent interactions affecting food safety.
Route-Specific Phytotoxicity: Foliar Polystyrene Nanoplastics Inhibit Rice Photosynthesis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared root versus foliar exposure routes for polystyrene nanoplastics in rice plants and found that foliar exposure caused far more sustained damage to photosynthesis. The nanoplastics accumulated in leaves and co-localized with chloroplasts, leading to dramatic reductions in photosynthetic pigments, ATP production, and carbon fixation. The study suggests that airborne nanoplastic deposition on crop leaves may represent an underappreciated route of agricultural harm.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.