We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A Different Protein Corona Cloaks “True-to-Life” Nanoplastics with Respect to Synthetic Polystyrene Nanobeads
Summary
Researchers produced 'true-to-life' nanoplastics by mechanically fragmenting everyday plastic items under cryogenic conditions and found they acquire a distinct protein corona compared to synthetic polystyrene nanobeads, suggesting that lab studies using commercial nanobeads may not accurately represent environmental nanoplastic behavior.
Given the complexity of separating nanoplastics from environmental samples, studies have usually been conducted using synthetic polystyrene nanobeads. By mechanical fragmentation in cryogenic conditions of daily-life plastic items, we produced “true-to-life” nanoplastics (T2LNPs), that promises to give a true insight into the interaction with biological systems. T2LNPs have been fully characterized by Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopy and by Atomic Force Microscopy. They result in populations of spheroidal nanoparticles with a broad multimodal size distribution. The mandatory need for a representative sample to evaluate the potential effects of nanoparticles on human health and the environment is demonstrated by the different protein corona identified on T2LNPs and synthetic polystyrene nanobeads upon incubation with human plasma.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A different protein corona cloaks “true-to-life” nanoplastics with respect to synthetic polystyrene nanobeads
Researchers found that environmentally realistic 'true-to-life' nanoplastics acquire a distinct protein corona compared to synthetic polystyrene nanobeads, suggesting that laboratory studies using standard nanobeads may not accurately reflect how environmental nanoplastics interact with biological systems.
A Different Protein Corona Cloaks “True-to-Life” Nanoplastics with Respect to Synthetic Polystyrene Nanobeads
Researchers produced 'true-to-life' nanoplastics by mechanically fragmenting real plastic products and compared them to the synthetic polystyrene beads typically used in lab studies. The real-world nanoplastics acquired a different protein coating when exposed to biological fluids, suggesting lab studies using synthetic beads may not accurately predict how environmental nanoplastics behave in living systems.
Structure of soft and hard protein corona around polystyrene nanoplastics—Particle size and protein types
Researchers characterized the protein corona that forms around polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes, finding that particle size influences which proteins bind and how tightly, with implications for nanoplastic toxicity and biological uptake.
Unravelling protein corona formation on pristine and leached microplastics
Researchers found that when microplastics encounter proteins in biological fluids, they get coated in a "protein corona" that depends heavily on the plastic's chemical additives, surface area, and how much it has been weathered in the environment. This coating changes how microplastics behave in the body, meaning toxicity studies need to account for these real-world surface changes.
Role of the Protein Corona in the Colloidal Behavior of Microplastics
Researchers investigated how protein coronas form on polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics in biological media, finding that proteins act as surfactants that alter the colloidal behavior and stability of microplastics in aquatic environments.