0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Big eyes can't see microplastics: Feeding selectivity and eco-morphological adaptations in oral cavity affect microplastic uptake in mud-dwelling amphibious mudskipper fish

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 51 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Pradeep Kumkar, Chandani R. Verma, Sachin M. Gosavi, Lukáš Kalous, Manoj Pise

Summary

Researchers studied microplastic contamination in mudskipper fish from the Ulhas River estuary in India, finding that pollution levels increased from suburban to urban-industrial areas. The fish ingested primarily filament-shaped microplastics, likely due to their filter-feeding habits and oral cavity adaptations. The study also found that microplastics served as carriers for heavy metals, suggesting they act as vectors for additional contaminants in estuarine ecosystems.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Microplastic contamination is a widespread global problem. Plastic pollution in the oceans has received a lot of news coverage, but there is a significant gap in our knowledge about its effect in estuarine areas and a profound regional bias in available information. Here, we estimated the degree of microplastic pollution, its impact on a selected fish, and its function as a vector for heavy metals in the Ulhas River estuary, which is one of the most fragile, polluted, and anthropogenically impacted estuaries in India. Using mudskipper fish, we have also assessed how the feeding guild and ecomorphological adaptations in the feeding apparatus affected the microplastic intake and life history traits of the fish. Sediment, water and fish samples were collected from three sampling localities (S1, S2 and S3) in the Ulhas River estuary and analysed. Findings showed an increase in microplastic abundance from S1 (suburban) to S3 (urban industrial belt) in sediment (96.67-130.0 particles kg), water (0.28-0.41 particles L) and fish (3.75-6.11 particles per fish). Fragments, followed by pellets and filaments largely contribute to the plastic morphotypes in sediment and water. FTIR analysis revealed polymers of anthropogenic and industrial origin such as polypropylene, Surlyn ionomer, low-density polyethylene, and polyethylene or polybutylene terephthalate. Only filaments were found in the guts of 74% of the mudskippers examined, which may be due to their filter-feeding habit and unique anatomical arrangement of oral structures that effectively filter large microplastic particles. Microplastic abundance showed a strong negative correlation with condition factor, fullness index and hepatosomatic index of fish. SEM-EDS analysis revealed that the microplastic surface topography played an important part in adsorbing heavy metals from a water body containing these contaminants. Results highlight the contamination of vulnerable estuarine habitats, harmful effects on resident biota, and health threats to dependent populations.

Share this paper

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion

Sign in
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.