0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Particle balance and return loops for microplastics in a tertiary-level wastewater treatment plant

Water Science & Technology 2021 49 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Pauliina Salmi, Pauliina Salmi, Pauliina Salmi, Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie Emilia Uurasjärvi, Kalle Ryymin, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Julia Talvitie Anna K. Karjalainen, Pauliina Salmi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Anna K. Karjalainen, Julia Talvitie Kalle Ryymin, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Julia Talvitie, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Kalle Ryymin, Kalle Ryymin, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Kalle Ryymin, Anna K. Karjalainen, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Kalle Ryymin, Anna Mikola, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Kalle Ryymin, Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Anna Mikola, Kalle Ryymin, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Anna Mikola, Julia Talvitie Emilia Uurasjärvi, Julia Talvitie, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Julia Talvitie Anna K. Karjalainen, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Pauliina Salmi, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Julia Talvitie, Julia Talvitie

Summary

Researchers tracked microplastics through 12 process steps in a tertiary-level wastewater treatment plant in Finland, finding that sludge treatment return loops represent a significant and underappreciated pathway for microplastics re-entering the water stream. The particle balance approach revealed that sludge processing stages deserve as much research attention as primary and secondary water treatment.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MPs) from households, stormwater, and various industries are transported to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), where a high proportion of them are captured before discharging their residuals to watersheds. Although recent studies have indicated that the removed MPs are mainly retained in wastewater sludge, sludge treatment processes have gained less attention in MP research than water streams at primary, secondary, and tertiary treatments. In this study, we sampled 12 different process steps in a tertiary-level municipal WWTP in central Finland. Our results showed that, compared to the plant influent load, three times more MPs circulated via reject water from the sludge centrifugation back to the beginning of the treatment process. Fibrous MPs were especially abundant in the dewatered sludge, whereas fragment-like MPs were observed in an aqueous stream. We concluded that, compared to the tertiary effluent, sludge treatment is the major exit route for MPs into the environment, but sludge treatment is also a return loop to the beginning of the process. Our sampling campaign also demonstrated that WWTPs with varying hydraulic conditions (such as the one studied here) benefit from disc filter-based tertiary treatments in MP removal.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper