0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Plastic Pollution Research in Indonesia: State of Science and Future Research Directions to Reduce Impacts

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2021 71 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Paul Vriend, Hidayat Hidayat, Judith van Leeuwen, Muhammad Reza Cordova, Noir P. Purba, Ansje Löhr, Ibnu Faizal, Nining Ningsih, Kirana Agustina, Semeidi Husrin, Devi Dwiyanti Suryono, Inneke Hantoro, Budi Widianarko, Prieskarinda Lestari, Bart Vermeulen, Tim van Emmerik

Summary

This meta-analysis examines the state of plastic pollution research in Indonesia, one of the world's top plastic-polluting countries. The study found that research methods and goals vary widely, making it hard to compare results or design effective cleanup strategies. Better coordinated research is needed to understand and reduce plastic pollution that eventually breaks down into microplastics affecting both marine life and human health.

Study Type Review

Several studies have suggested Indonesia to be among the top plastic polluting countries globally. Data on the presence and amounts of plastic pollution are required to help design effective plastic reduction and mitigation strategies. Research quantifying plastic pollution in Indonesia has picked up in recent years. However, a lack of central coordination in this research has led to research output with different goals, methods, and data formats. In this study we present a meta-analysis of studies published on plastic pollution in Indonesia to uncover gaps and biases in current research, and to use these insights to suggest ways to improve future research to fill these gaps. Research gaps and biases identified include a clear preference for marine research, and a bias toward certain environmental compartments within the marine, riverine, and terrestrial systems that have easy to apply methods. Units of measurement used to express results vary greatly between studies, making it difficult to compare data effectively. Nevertheless, we identify polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene variants (PE, HDPE, LDPE) to be among the most frequently found polymers in both macro- and microplastic pollution in Indonesia, though polymer identification is lacking in a large part of the studies. Plastic research is mostly done on Java (59% of the studies). We recommend research methods used to quantify plastic pollution to be harmonized. Moreover, we recommend a shift in focus of research toward the riverine and terrestrial environments and a shift of focus of environmental compartments analyzed within these systems, an increase in spatial coverage of research across Indonesia, and lastly, a larger focus on polymer characterization. With these changes we envision future research which can aid with the design of more effective and targeted reduction and mitigation strategies.

Share this paper