We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
From Pristine to Laboratory-weathered Micro- and Nanoplastics: Interaction with Environmental Contaminants and Biological Effects
Summary
This review contrasts pristine and laboratory-weathered micro- and nanoplastics in terms of surface chemistry, adsorption of co-contaminants, and biological effects, arguing that weathered particles better represent real-world exposures and often exhibit different or greater toxicity.
Plastic pollution is a major global concern with far-reaching implications for ecosystems, environmental sustainability, and human/wildlife health. Among plastic-derived contaminants, micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are of particular concern due to their small size, persistence, and surface reactivity. Although commercial pristine MNPs have been widely used in early toxicological studies, they are increasingly considered inadequate to reflect real-world scenarios. Once into the environment MNPs undergo substantial physicochemical changes due to aging processes, which may alter their interactions with other pollutants and influence their biological effects. In light of this, growing attention is being directed toward more environmentally relevant forms of MNPs. In this context, we investigated the impact of various polystyrene-based MNPs – pristine, COOH-functionalized, and laboratory-weathered – using both in vitro and in vivo biological models. Given their dual role as pollutants and vectors, interactions between MNPs and two widespread environmental contaminants, bisphenol A (BPA) and cadmium (Cd), were also examined, along with their combined biological effects. The biological impact of 5 µm commercial microplastics (MPs) – both pristine and COOH-functionalized (COOH-MPs) – was investigated across multiple cell models, including 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, HepG2 hepatocytes, GT1-7 hypothalamic neurons, and BAE-1 endothelial cells. COOH-MPs, bearing surface carboxyl groups representative of oxidized plastics, induced mild cytotoxicity in GT1-7 and BAE-1 cells, and showed significantly enhanced BPA adsorption and desorption compared to pristine MPs, as revealed by HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Moreover, exposure to COOH-MPs, either alone or pre-adsorbed with BPA, affected triglyceride accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Further experiments in HepG2 cells using 500 nm nanoplastics (NPs) revealed oxidative stress induction without noticeable cytotoxic effects. Interestingly, co-exposure with Cd attenuated Cd-induced toxicity and, during in vitro steatosis induction, led to a reduction in lipid accumulation. This effect was likely driven by complex interactions among fatty acids, Cd ions, and NPs, as supported by electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering analyses. To expand our investigations, we focused on the biological effects of NPs with greater environmental relevance at a whole-organism level. Specifically, the effects of the exposure to ⁓100 nm simulated environmental particles (SEPs), derived from the degradation and laboratory-weathering of plastic cutlery, were compared to those of pristine NPs in zebrafish embryos and larvae. SEPs elicited stronger toxic responses than pristine beads, primarily causing developmental delays. Furthermore, analyses at 6 days post-fertilization revealed that exposure to SEPs at environmentally relevant concentrations (0.1 mg/L) caused elevated cortisol levels, activation of stress and hypoxia pathways, and altered locomotor behavior. Overall, these findings confirm that surface chemistry and environmental weathering critically influence MNPs toxicity and their interactions with pollutants. Moreover, they underscore the necessity of incorporating realistic exposure scenarios in environmental toxicology research.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Weathering pathways and protocols for environmentally relevant microplastics and nanoplastics: What are we missing?
This review highlights a major gap in microplastics research: most lab studies use brand-new, pristine plastic particles, but microplastics in the real world have been weathered by sunlight, water, and biological activity. Weathered microplastics behave differently, releasing more chemicals and interacting with organisms in ways that fresh plastics do not. Only about 10% of published studies have used aged microplastics, meaning current risk assessments may not reflect the true dangers of environmental microplastic exposure.
The wheel of time: The environmental dance of aged micro- and nanoplastics and their biological resonance
This review examines how micro- and nanoplastics change as they age in the environment through exposure to sunlight, water, and biological activity. Aged plastics behave differently than fresh ones: they accumulate faster in ecosystems, are more easily taken up by organisms, and can release trapped chemicals as they break down. The findings suggest that the real-world health and environmental risks of microplastics may be greater than lab studies using new, unweathered plastics indicate.
Effects of Weathering on Microplastic Dispersibility and Pollutant Uptake Capacity
This study examined how environmental weathering changes the surface properties of microplastics and their ability to absorb co-pollutants, finding that weathered MPs bind more contaminants than pristine particles due to surface oxidation and cracking. The results emphasize that the environmental fate and toxicity of microplastics change dynamically as they age in the environment.
Chemical reactivity of weathered nanoplastics and their interactions with heavy metals
Researchers examined the chemical reactivity of weathered nanoplastics following abiotic and biotic degradation processes, finding that weathering substantially alters the surface chemistry of nanoplastics and enhances their capacity to interact with and facilitate the transformation of legacy heavy metal contaminants in the environment.
Environmental Implications of Physicochemical Differences Between Environmental Nanoplastics and Their Commercial Forms
Researchers conceptually analyzed physicochemical differences between environmentally aged nanoplastics and their commercial engineered forms, examining how natural aging alters surface properties, environmental stability, and behavior in aquatic media for five types of environmentally relevant nanoplastic models.