0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Circulation of fibrous microplastic (microfiber) in sewage and sewage sludge treatment processes

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 55 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Satoshi Nakao, Kohsuke Akita, Asako Ozaki, K. Masumoto, Tetsuji Okuda

Summary

The circulation of microfibers through sewage and sludge treatment processes was tracked in a Japanese facility, finding that while most microfibers were removed from wastewater into sludge during primary and secondary treatment, some were re-released during sludge digestion and dewatering, creating a secondary recirculation pathway back into treated effluent.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The fate of microplastics (MPs) in the sewage treatment process has been investigated worldwide, and novel results have been reported; few studies have also clarified the fate of MPs in the sewage sludge treatment process. Although most MPs in sewage are transferred to sludge, some flow back from the sludge treatment process to the sewage treatment process. Therefore, throughout the sewage treatment plant, the removal rate of MPs may increase via a countermeasure during the sludge treatment process. In this study, samples obtained from sewage and sewage sludge treatments were used to degrade organic matter with hydrogen peroxide. Water sample particles were trapped on Ni filters with 20-μm-sized pores, dried at room temperature and then the MPs were detected and identified by FTIR microscopy. Note that sludge samples were treated with hydrogen peroxide and separated by specific gravity using NaI solution. The concentration of MPs per unit volume was then calculated and the MPs load was estimated using flow rates of water and sludge. Subsequently, we clarified the fate of MPs with sizes of 20 μm or greater in a sewage treatment plant. When the MPs load in the influent sewage is 100%, 12% of the MPs were found to return to the sewage treatment process via the sidestream of the sludge treatment process. Per this observation, it was made evident that MPs are in fact circulating throughout the sewage and sludge treatment processes. MPs in the sidestream mainly consisted of the effluent from the sludge concentration process, and most MPs were thought to be fibrous polyethylene terephthalate (fibrous MPs, i.e. microfibers [MFs]). The results show that MFs circulate throughout the sewage and sludge treatment processes, and for effectively increasing the removal rate of MPs, the removal of MFs proves correspondingly effective during the sludge treatment process.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Circulation of microplastics in a municipal wastewater treatment plant with multiphase activated sludge

Researchers tracked the circulation of microplastics through a municipal wastewater treatment plant, from raw wastewater through sludge processing. They found that most microplastics accumulated in sewage sludge at high concentrations, and that leachate from sludge treatment recycled microplastics back into the treatment process. The study highlights how wastewater treatment plants can inadvertently redistribute microplastics rather than fully removing them from the waste stream.

Article Tier 2

Behavior and flow of microplastics during sludge treatment in Japan

Sampling of two Osaka wastewater treatment plants found microplastics at every stage of the sludge treatment process, with 13 polymer types identified; concentration increased through dewatering, but the total MP load in final biosolids was lower than in raw sludge.

Article Tier 2

Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge

Researchers tracked microplastics through a wastewater treatment plant and found 12 different polymer types in effluents and sludge, with smaller particles (25–104 μm) most abundant and fibres displaying lower sizes than fragments. The study demonstrates that WWTPs do not fully remove microplastics and that processed sludge marketed as soil amendment carries plastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Tracing the fate of microplastic in wastewater treatment plant: A multi-stage analysis of treatment units and sludge

Researchers tracked microplastics through every stage of a wastewater treatment plant and found that while treatment removes many particles from the water, most end up concentrated in the leftover sludge. Fibers and fragments were the most common shapes, made primarily of polyester and polyethylene. Since treated sludge is often spread on farmland, this creates a pathway for microplastics to enter soil and potentially the food chain.

Article Tier 2

Particle balance and return loops for microplastics in a tertiary-level wastewater treatment plant

Researchers tracked microplastics through 12 process steps in a tertiary-level wastewater treatment plant in Finland, finding that sludge treatment return loops represent a significant and underappreciated pathway for microplastics re-entering the water stream. The particle balance approach revealed that sludge processing stages deserve as much research attention as primary and secondary water treatment.

Share this paper