0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

The distribution and ecological effects of microplastics in an estuarine ecosystem

Environmental Pollution 2021 36 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Samantha M. Ladewig, Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Samantha M. Ladewig, Julie A. Hope, Samantha M. Ladewig, Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Giovanni Coco, Samantha M. Ladewig, Samantha M. Ladewig, Giovanni Coco, Samantha M. Ladewig, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Giovanni Coco, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Julie A. Hope, Julie A. Hope, Samantha M. Ladewig, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Julie A. Hope, Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Giovanni Coco, Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush Simon F. Thrush

Summary

Researchers surveyed 22 intertidal sites and found that microplastic abundance, size, and diversity correlated with benthic microalgal communities and sediment biostabilization properties in an estuarine ecosystem.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Coastal sediments, where microplastics (MPs) accumulate, support benthic microalgae (BMA) that contribute to ecosystem functions such as primary production, nutrient recycling and sediment biostabilization. The potential interactions between MPs, BMA and associated properties and functions remain poorly understood. To examine these interactions, a survey of 22 intertidal sites was conducted. MP abundance, size and a suite of MP diversity indices (based on color and shape) were determined from surface sediments alongside biochemical and physical properties. MPs were detected at all sites and dominated by polypropylene (34%), polyester (18%) and polyethylene (11%). Fragment and fiber dominance (16-92% and 6-81% respectively) and color-shape category diversity varied significantly by site. Distance-based linear models demonstrated that estuary-wide, mean grain size and mud were the best predictors of MP abundance-diversity matrices, but variance explained was low (9%). Relationships were improved when the data was split into sandy and muddy habitats. In sandy habitats (<8% mud), physical properties of the bed (mean grain size, mud content and distance from the estuary mouth) were still selected as predictors of MP abundance-diversity (14% variance explained); but a number of bivariate relationships were detected with biochemical properties such as BMA associated pigments and organic matter. In muddy habitats (>8% mud), porewater ammonium was lower when fiber abundance and overall MP diversity were higher. The inclusion of porewater ammonium, organic matter content and pheophytins alongside physical properties explained a greater percentage of the variance in MP abundance-diversity for muddy habitats (21%). The results highlight the importance of examining plastic shapes and MP categories in addition to abundance and emphasize that functionally different habitats should be examined separately to increase our understanding of MP-biota-function relationships.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper