We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Making Information Measurement Meaningful: The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and the Social and Human Capital Protocol
Summary
This study examined how UN Sustainable Development Goals have encouraged corporate sustainability reporting, finding that current frameworks like the Social and Human Capital Protocol face challenges with validity, comparability, and greenwashing that limit their effectiveness in driving genuine sustainability outcomes.
Drucker’s saying that “What gets measured gets managed” is examined in the context of corporate social responsibility. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals have encouraged sustainability reporting, and a reporting tool, the Social and Human Capital Protocol, has been developed to assist measurement and provide information to support the achievement of sustainability. This information should be valid and reliable; however, it is not easy to measure social and human capital factors. Additionally, companies use a large number of methodologies and indicators that are difficult to compare, and they may sometimes only present positive outcomes as a form of greenwashing. This lack of full transparency and comparability with other companies has the potential to discredit their reports, thereby supporting the claims of climate change deniers, free-market idealogues and conspiracy theorists who often use social media to spread their perspectives. This paper will describe the development of environmental reporting and CSR, discuss the natural capital protocol, and assess the extent to which the Social and Human Capital Protocol is able to fulfil its purpose of providing SMART objective measurements. It is the first academic article to provide a detailed examination of the Social and Human Capital Protocol.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Duurzaam betere jaarverslaggeving
This paper examines sustainability reporting practices in annual reports, analysing how organisations communicate environmental and social performance to stakeholders. The study evaluates current standards and frameworks for sustainable corporate reporting and identifies areas for improvement in transparency and comparability.
Sustainability reporting as a 21st century problem statement: using a quality lens to understand and analyse the challenges
This study argues that corporate sustainability reporting lacks rigour and comparability, proposing that quality science and quality management principles could provide a robust framework for standardising how organisations measure and communicate their environmental and social performance.
Indicator-based environmental and social sustainability assessment of hospitals: A literature review
Researchers reviewed 88 studies on how hospitals measure their environmental and social sustainability, finding wide inconsistencies in what gets measured and how, with major gaps in tracking upstream supply-chain impacts like food and pharmaceuticals. The review proposes a standardized framework to help healthcare institutions better report on their sustainability performance.
Factors affecting the application of social responsibility accounting: Evidence from plastic manufacturing companies
This is not about microplastics — it is a business and accounting study examining factors that influence Vietnamese plastic manufacturing companies' adoption of social responsibility accounting practices linked to UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Beyond the Surface: A Critical Analysis of Corporate Water Accounting Literature for Sustainable Development
This systematic review analysed 47 articles on corporate water accounting using bibliometric and content analysis, finding the field remains in early stages with geographically concentrated research and proposing an integrative framework to address thematic drivers and barriers to sustainable water management.