0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Indicator-based environmental and social sustainability assessment of hospitals: A literature review

Journal of Cleaner Production 2024 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lukas Meßmann, Sandra Köhler, Katerina Antimisaris, Ricarda Fieber, Andrea Thorenz, Axel Tuma

Summary

Researchers reviewed 88 studies on how hospitals measure their environmental and social sustainability, finding wide inconsistencies in what gets measured and how, with major gaps in tracking upstream supply-chain impacts like food and pharmaceuticals. The review proposes a standardized framework to help healthcare institutions better report on their sustainability performance.

The healthcare sector’s direct and indirect GHG emissions account for 4%−5% of global net emissions. Hospitals face the challenge of sustainable transformations and need to measure, monitor, and report on their sustainability performance. While indicator-based assessments of hospital sustainability have received increased attention over the last years, they are heterogenous in their terminologies, categories, and included indicators. This study reviews taxonomies and included indicators in hospital sustainability assessments, laying the foundation for future developments of consistent indicator-based assessments. The objective is to (1) critically review existing assessments of hospitals; (2) identify relevant sustainability topics in a hospital context and derive a best-practice categorization; (3) highlight thematical gaps. Based on the PRISMA method, we identify 88 relevant articles. First, 47 articles (comprehensive hospital sustainability assessments with extensive indicator sets) are reviewed, forming the basis for deriving a best-practice categorization. Second, considering an additional 41 articles (proposing indicators for specific hospital aspects), we collect all indicators and compile a consolidated indicator pool. We find substantial variations in the taxonomies and terminologies of the reviewed articles; most notably, there is a disagreement about what constitutes an indicator. 73% of all consolidated indicators are qualitative, and 78% are site-specific. Thematical gaps relate to sustainability along upstream and downstream value chains (esp. food and pharmaceuticals) and quantitative social indicators in general. The developed best-practice taxonomy and the compiled indicator pool serve as a comprehensive basis for future sustainability assessments of hospitals.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Nurses as agents for achieving environmentally sustainable health systems: A bibliometric analysis

This bibliometric analysis examined the role of nurses in achieving environmentally sustainable health systems, finding a lack of experimental data and policies and highlighting that nurses should be included in sustainability decision-making within healthcare.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care: beyond carbon

Researchers reviewed the full environmental footprint of healthcare — going beyond greenhouse gas emissions to include water pollution, toxic chemicals, and microplastics — and found that drugs like propofol and antibiotics discharged into waterways, along with massive quantities of disposable plastic equipment, pose serious ecological risks. The article calls on clinicians and policymakers to adopt holistic strategies that reduce waste, limit single-use plastics, and account for the full spectrum of environmental harm.

Article Tier 2

Toward Sustainable Healthcare: Examining ESG ‐Readiness in Austrian Regional State‐Owned Hospitals

This study investigated ESG reporting practices among Austrian state-owned hospitals and found that most are at an early stage of structured environmental, social, and governance reporting. While management commitment and employee engagement were identified as key drivers, limited resources and administrative burdens hinder progress, with current efforts focusing heavily on social issues while neglecting environmental and governance dimensions.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability in the Operating Room

Researchers review the outsized environmental footprint of surgical operating rooms — particularly from volatile anesthetic agents, medications, and single-use equipment — and argue that anesthesiology has exceptional leverage to reduce healthcare's greenhouse gas emissions and waste burden as part of a broader sustainability transformation in medicine.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability Challenges in Diagnostic Healthcare: Environmental Risks and Policy Responses

Researchers examined the environmental sustainability challenges posed by diagnostic healthcare operations, including biomedical waste, single-use plastics, chemical residues, microplastics, and greenhouse gas emissions. The study identified structural barriers such as regulatory gaps, fragmented waste infrastructure, and insufficient environmental performance measurement. A multi-level policy framework is proposed covering strengthened regulation, circular economy strategies, decarbonization, and improved waste management to reduce the environmental footprint of diagnostic laboratories.

Share this paper