We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A Critical Review of the Availability, Reliability, and Ecological Relevance of Arctic Species Toxicity Tests for Use in Environmental Risk Assessment
Summary
This critical review scored 48 Arctic species toxicity studies and found that most fail reliability and ecological relevance criteria, concluding that over-reliance on temperate-species tests likely underestimates contaminant harm to Arctic organisms in environmental risk assessments.
There is a pressing need to understand the impact of contaminants on Arctic ecosystems; however, most toxicity tests are based on temperate species, and there are issues with reliability and relevance of bioassays in general. Together this may result in an underestimation of harm to Arctic organisms and contribute to significant uncertainty in risk assessments. To help address these concerns, a critical review to assess reported effects for these species, quantify methodological and endpoint relevance gaps, and identify future research needs for testing was performed. We developed uniform criteria to score each study, allowing an objective comparison across experiments to quantify their reliability and relevance. We scored a total of 48 individual studies, capturing 39 tested compounds, 73 unique Arctic test species, and 95 distinct endpoints published from 1975 to 2021. Our analysis shows that of 253 test substance and species combinations scored (i.e., a unique toxicity test), 207 (82%) failed to meet at least one critical study criterion that contributes to data reliability for use in risk assessment. Arctic-focused toxicity testing needs to ensure that exposures can be analytically confirmed, include environmentally realistic exposure scenarios, and report test methods more thoroughly. Significant data gaps were identified as related to standardized toxicity testing with Arctic species, diversity of compounds tested with these organisms, and the inclusion of ecologically relevant sublethal and chronic endpoints assessed in Arctic toxicity testing. Overall, there needs to be ongoing improvement in test conduction and reporting in the scientific literature to support effective risk assessments in an Arctic context. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:46-72. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
The influence of global climate change on accumulation and toxicity of persistent organic pollutants and chemicals of emerging concern in Arctic food webs
This review examined how climate change affects the accumulation and toxicity of persistent organic pollutants in Arctic food webs. Researchers found that warming temperatures, melting permafrost, and shifting species ranges are changing how contaminants move through and concentrate in Arctic ecosystems. The study suggests that climate change and chemical pollution together may create compounding stress on Arctic wildlife populations.
An ecotoxicological risk model for the microplastics in arctic waters
Researchers developed a novel ecotoxicological risk model for microplastics in Arctic marine waters, incorporating oxidative stress as a toxicity endpoint and accounting for Arctic-specific environmental conditions and species physiology. The model predicted elevated risk for Arctic biota under current microplastic concentrations, particularly for filter feeders and small crustaceans.
Current efforts on microplastic monitoring in Arctic fish and how to proceed
This review examined published studies on microplastics in Arctic fish, finding limited but growing evidence of contamination across multiple Arctic regions and calling for standardized monitoring protocols and improved risk assessment frameworks.
Microplastic pollution in the Arctic Ocean: Assessing ingestion and potential health effects in Calanus and Neocalanus copepods
This review assessed the extent of microplastic ingestion by Arctic marine organisms and evaluated the potential risks to both wildlife and human consumers of Arctic seafood. The authors found evidence of microplastic ingestion across multiple species and called for more research on long-term ecological impacts in polar environments.
Pollution in the Arctic Ocean: An overview of multiple pressures and implications for ecosystem services
Researchers reviewed the multiple environmental pressures facing the Arctic Ocean, including a complex mix of chemical pollutants, climate change, and fishing activity, finding that current policies and data are insufficient to assess their combined impacts on fragile Arctic ecosystems. The study calls for targeted Arctic research and updated monitoring frameworks to better protect the region's ecosystem services — which include food, climate regulation, and global trade routes.