0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Examining sampling protocols for microplastics on recreational trails

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 17 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nicola Forster, Susan Wilson, M. Tighe

Summary

This study developed and tested sampling protocols for detecting microplastics on hiking and trail running routes in nature reserves. Microplastics were found on trail surfaces, likely shed from synthetic clothing, footwear, and equipment used by outdoor recreationists. The findings highlight recreational trails as an underappreciated source of microplastic contamination in natural areas.

Hiking and trail running are increasingly popular and could present a significant source of microplastics on recreational trails in nature reserves, wilderness areas and conservation areas. Deposition may be concentrated on trail surfaces, however sampling techniques for microplastics on soil or rock surfaces have not yet been developed. In this study, sampling strategies were evaluated for microplastics on three types of recreational trail surfaces - asphalt, compacted soil, and a loose overlay of soil. We spiked trail surfaces with pink rubber microplastics and collected samples using a handheld vacuum, manual sweeping, and gel lifter tape. Spiked and in situ microplastics were extracted from soil samples using density separation (NaI, ρ = 1.6 g cm) with organic matter digestion (30% HO), then visualised and counted using stereomicroscopy. The gel lifter tape yielded the highest recovery of spiked and counts of in situ microplastics on asphalt (118% ± 15%, 3183 ± 830 microplastics per 40 cm) and compacted soil (127% ± 7%, 333 ± 106 microplastics per 40 cm). Sweeping produced quantitative recovery for spiked microplastics on compacted soil (88% ± 13%) but yielded significantly fewer in situ microplastics (148 ± 40 microplastics per 40 cm) than the tape. Sweeping was the only technique to achieve quantitative recovery of spiked microplastics in the loose overlay of soil (110% ± 14%) when soil carbon was 0.8% ± 0.3%, however increasing soil carbon was associated with reduced microplastic recovery. Preliminary assessment indicated quantification of microplastics smaller than 100 μm was not possible with any of the methods tested. Sweeping and the gel lifter tape were both effective for evaluating microplastic deposition and spatial distribution on recreational trails, depending on the properties of the trail.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic pollution on hiking and running trails in Australian protected environments

This study detected and characterized microplastics on hiking and trail running routes in Australian protected natural areas, finding that footwear and clothing shed significant quantities of synthetic microplastic fibers onto trails in ecologically sensitive environments.

Article Tier 2

Plastics on the rocks: the invisible but harmful footprint of shoe soles

This study found that shoe soles worn on a short mountain hiking trail shed significant quantities of microplastic particles, contaminating the path and surrounding vegetation. The finding reveals that recreational outdoor activities are an overlooked source of microplastic pollution even in protected natural areas.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic surface retention and mobility on hiking trails

Researchers simulated heavy rainfall on hiking trail surfaces and measured the mobility of microplastic particles deposited by trail users, finding that rainfall can transport deposited microplastics off trails and into adjacent soil and waterways, extending the environmental footprint of trail recreation.

Article Tier 2

Trail running events contribute microplastic pollution to conservation and wilderness areas

Using before-after-control-impact sampling at a trail running event in an Australian conservation area, researchers found that the event significantly increased microplastic concentrations on trails compared to control sites, with synthetic clothing and footwear identified as the primary sources.

Article Tier 2

An Examination of Microplastic Pollution in Protected Areas from Outdoor Recreation

Microplastics were found in soils from protected natural areas frequently visited by outdoor recreationists, suggesting that even conservation lands and wilderness parks are not insulated from plastic pollution carried in by human visitors.

Share this paper