0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Plastics on the rocks: the invisible but harmful footprint of shoe soles

Comptes Rendus Géoscience 2023 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Philippe Cecchi

Summary

This study found that shoe soles worn on a short mountain hiking trail shed significant quantities of microplastic particles, contaminating the path and surrounding vegetation. The finding reveals that recreational outdoor activities are an overlooked source of microplastic pollution even in protected natural areas.

Outdoor recreational activities for leisure and for sport training have grown in popularity. Their environmental impacts remain little studied, especially the waste generated by over-frequentation. Our objective was to document how frequentation of a short mountain hiking trail can lead to significant quantities of waste. To this aim, all small objects found along a three-kilometer trail were collected and their origin determined. Polymers were predominant, and were mostly shoe sole fragments. This has never been documented and must be publicized due to the potential harmfulness to terrestrial and riparian ecosystems, and to increase the walkers’ awareness.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic pollution on hiking and running trails in Australian protected environments

This study detected and characterized microplastics on hiking and trail running routes in Australian protected natural areas, finding that footwear and clothing shed significant quantities of synthetic microplastic fibers onto trails in ecologically sensitive environments.

Article Tier 2

Examining sampling protocols for microplastics on recreational trails

This study developed and tested sampling protocols for detecting microplastics on hiking and trail running routes in nature reserves. Microplastics were found on trail surfaces, likely shed from synthetic clothing, footwear, and equipment used by outdoor recreationists. The findings highlight recreational trails as an underappreciated source of microplastic contamination in natural areas.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic surface retention and mobility on hiking trails

Researchers simulated heavy rainfall on hiking trail surfaces and measured the mobility of microplastic particles deposited by trail users, finding that rainfall can transport deposited microplastics off trails and into adjacent soil and waterways, extending the environmental footprint of trail recreation.

Article Tier 2

Release of Microplastics from Shoe Outsoles into the Environment by Walking and Jogging, and Ingestion of Shoe Outsole Microplastics by Goldfish

Researchers quantified microplastic release from shoe outsoles during walking and jogging, finding that shoe abrasion generates measurable plastic particles that enter aquatic environments and can be ingested by goldfish. A series of five experiments demonstrated a direct relationship between distance traveled and shoe weight loss, establishing footwear as an underappreciated terrestrial source of microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

An Examination of Microplastic Pollution in Protected Areas from Outdoor Recreation

Microplastics were found in soils from protected natural areas frequently visited by outdoor recreationists, suggesting that even conservation lands and wilderness parks are not insulated from plastic pollution carried in by human visitors.

Share this paper