0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Why do we monitor? Using seabird eggs to track trends in Arctic environmental contamination

Environmental Reviews 2021 45 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Kristin Bianchini, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Derek C. G. Muir Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Birgit M. Braune, Mark L. Mallory, Derek C. G. Muir Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Derek C. G. Muir Derek C. G. Muir Derek C. G. Muir Birgit M. Braune, Birgit M. Braune, Birgit M. Braune, Birgit M. Braune, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Derek C. G. Muir Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Derek C. G. Muir Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Derek C. G. Muir Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Derek C. G. Muir Mark L. Mallory, Derek C. G. Muir Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Mark L. Mallory, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Mark L. Mallory, Derek C. G. Muir

Summary

Researchers analyzed nearly 50 years of contaminant monitoring data from Arctic seabird eggs, finding that while legacy POPs like PCBs have declined since the 1970s, emerging contaminants such as PFAS and flame retardants have increased, validating seabird eggs as long-term pollution indicators.

Contaminant levels and trends have been monitored in the eggs of seabirds from the Canadian Arctic since 1975. Nearly 50 years of monitoring have provided key information regarding the temporal and spatial variation of various contaminant classes in different seabird species. However, previous work has primarily assessed individual or related contaminant classes in isolation. There is therefore a need to collectively consider all of the contaminants monitored in seabird eggs to determine where monitoring has been successful, to find areas for improvement, and to identify opportunities for future research. In this review, we evaluated monitoring data for the major legacy and emerging contaminants of concern in five seabird species from three High Arctic and three Low Arctic colonies in Canada. We review the history of Canada’s Arctic seabird egg monitoring program and discuss how monitoring efforts have changed over time; we summarize temporal, spatial, and interspecies variations in Arctic seabird egg contamination and identify important knowledge gaps; and, we discuss future directions for ecotoxicology research using seabird eggs in Arctic Canada. Ultimately, this paper provides a high-level overview of the egg contaminant monitoring program and underscores the importance of long-term and continued seabird contaminant monitoring in Arctic Canada.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper