We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics impacts in seven flagellate microalgae: Role of size and cell wall
Summary
Seven marine flagellate microalgae species were incubated with 1-micrometer polystyrene microplastics at 10 mg/L, revealing that cell size and the presence of a cell wall strongly influenced the degree of microplastic-induced physiological and growth effects across species.
The toxicity of microplastic particles (MPs) on aquatic environments has been widely reported; however, their effects on protists are still contradictory. For example, it is unclear if cell size and cell wall have a role in shaping the response of flagellates to MPs. In this study, seven marine flagellated microalgae (six Dinoflagellates and one Raphidophyceae) were incubated with 10 mg L MPs (polystyrene plastic micro-spheres, 1 μm diameter) to address the above question by measuring different response variables, i.e., growth, optimal photochemical efficiency (F/F), chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and cell morphology. The effect of MPs on growth and F/F showed species-specificity effects. Maximum and minimum MPs-induced inhibitions were detected in Karenia mikimotoi (76.43%) and Akashiwo sanguinea (10.16%), respectively, while the rest of the species showed intermediate responses. The presence of MPs was associated with an average reduction of Chl-a content in most cases and with a higher superoxide dismutase activity in all cases. Seven species were classified into two groups by the variation of Chl-a under MPs treatment. One group (Prorocentrum minimum and Karenia mikimotoi) showed increased Chl-a, while the other (P. donghaiense, P. micans, Alexandrium tamarense, Akashiwo sanguinea, Heterosigma akashiwo) showed decreased Chl-a content. The MPs-induced growth inhibition was negatively correlated with cell size in the latter group. SEM images further indicated that MPs-induced malformation in the smaller cells (e.g., P. donghaiense and K. mikimotoi) was more severe than the bigger cells (e.g., A. sanguinea and P. micans), probably due to a relatively higher ratio of the cell surface to cell volume in the former. These results implicate that the effect of MPs on marine flagellated microalgae was related to the cell size among most species but not cell wall. Thus plastic pollution may have size-dependent effects on phytoplankton in future scenarios.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Size-dependent cellular internalization and effects of polystyrene microplastics in microalgae P. helgolandica var. tsingtaoensis and S. quadricauda
Researchers investigated whether polystyrene microplastics of different sizes could be internalized by marine and freshwater microalgae cells. Using confocal laser scanning and 3D image analysis, the study found size-dependent cellular uptake, with smaller microbeads more readily internalized, suggesting that microplastic size is a critical factor in their biological interactions with phytoplankton.
Concentration dependent toxicity of microplastics to marine microalgae
Researchers exposed the marine microalga Chlorella sp. to polystyrene microplastics at concentrations of 10 and 50 mg/L, finding that even low concentrations inhibited growth and disrupted photosynthesis, while higher concentrations caused more pronounced oxidative stress.
Energy metabolism response induced by microplastic for marine dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi
Researchers examined how different sizes and types of plastic particles affect the energy metabolism of the marine dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi. The study found that smaller polystyrene particles caused greater damage to cell membrane potential, increased polysaccharide content, and weakened ATPase activity, indicating that nano-scale plastics have a more pronounced impact on cellular energy metabolism than larger microplastics.
Evaluating physiological responses of microalgae towards environmentally coexisting microplastics: A meta-analysis
A meta-analysis of 52 studies found that microplastics inhibit microalgal growth and photosynthesis and induce oxidative damage, though microalgae can recover over time. Cyanobacteria are more vulnerable than green algae, and the relative size of microplastics to algal cells governs the mechanism of impact, while aged versus pristine microplastics have opposite effects on extracellular polymeric substance and microcystin production.
Microplastic interactions with freshwater microalgae: Hetero-aggregation and changes in plastic density appear strongly dependent on polymer type
Researchers studied interactions between microplastics and freshwater microalgae, finding that microplastics can physically attach to algal cells to form hetero-aggregates, altering both particle behavior and algal physiology.