0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Hydrodynamics shape riverine biofilms on microplastics: insights from an in-situ incubation study

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 43 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rizwan Khaleel, Markus Rolf, Julian Wagenhofer, Lisa-Marie Jaax, Yifan Lu, Hannes Laermanns, F. O. Nitsche, Christina Bogner

Summary

Researchers incubated polystyrene microplastics in the Rhine River under different water flow conditions and found that faster-flowing water produced much denser and more diverse microbial communities (called biofilms) on the plastic surfaces. Because biofilms change how microplastics move and interact with ecosystems, water flow conditions need to be considered when studying microplastic behavior in real rivers.

Abstract Microplastics (MPs) are recognized as emerging pollutants in aquatic environments, where they are rapidly colonized by microbial communities that form biofilms. These biofilms can alter the environmental behaviour, transport characteristics, and ecological impact of MPs. Although many studies have simulated biofilm formation under laboratory conditions, fewer have examined natural biofilm development on MPs in freshwater systems. This study investigates biofilm formation on polystyrene (PS) MPs (shape: fragments) in different flow conditions of a natural riverine setting. The goal is to develop a protocol for producing environmentally relevant biofilm-coated MPs. PS MPs of two size classes, namely 20–75 $$\upmu$$ m and 600–1000 $$\upmu$$ m, were incubated for four weeks in the Rhine River using a perforated box (low flow environment) and a tube setup (high flow environment). Immersion microscopic observations revealed widespread microbial colonization across all MPs, with higher flow conditions supporting visibly more surface coverage and diverse biofilms. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of various microorganisms-including diatoms, bacteria, ciliates, and choanoflagellates-in the high-flow tube setup, whereas they were largely absent in the low-flow box setup. Spectrophotometric analysis using crystal violet staining confirmed significantly higher biofilm biomass (higher absorbance values) in the tube incubation setup (0.2374 ± 0.0865) compared to the box setup (0.0764 ± 0.0225). The results demonstrated that flow velocity plays a critical role in shaping biofilm density and microbial composition. Higher flow conditions likely promoted greater nutrient exchange and surface contact, facilitating enhanced colonization. These findings underscore the importance of mimicking realistic hydrodynamic conditions when preparing biofilm-coated MPs for environmental studies. The methodology developed in this study is a step towards a standardized approach to generating environmentally relevant MPs, which can improve the accuracy of future research on MP behaviour, transport, and ecological interactions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The role of biofilm and hydrodynamics on the fate of microplastic particles in rivers: an experimental study

Researchers conducted experimental flume studies to investigate how biofilm formation and hydrodynamic conditions jointly govern microplastic particle fate in rivers, examining why some urbanized and industrialized river reaches show no significant upstream-to-downstream increase in microplastic concentration despite theoretical inputs.

Article Tier 2

The role of biofilm and hydrodynamics on the fate of microplastic particles in rivers: an experimental study

Researchers conducted flume and field experiments to examine how biofilm formation and hydrodynamic conditions govern the fate of microplastic particles in rivers, investigating why some MP-polluted rivers crossing industrialized areas show no significant upstream-to-downstream concentration differences. The study identified biofilm-mediated density changes and turbulence as key factors controlling whether low-density MPs remain suspended or settle into sediments.

Article Tier 2

Riverine microplastic and microbial community compositions: A field study in the Netherlands

Researchers collected microplastic samples from the Dutch section of the Rhine River and analyzed the microbial communities living on them. The study found an average of over 213,000 microplastic particles per cubic meter of water, with polyamide and PVC being the most common types. Larger microplastics hosted distinctly different bacterial communities compared to the surrounding water, including biofilm-forming species and potential pathogens, raising concerns about microplastics as vehicles for harmful microorganisms.

Article Tier 2

Distinctive patterns of bacterial community succession in the riverine micro-plastisphere in view of biofilm development and ecological niches

Scientists studied how bacterial communities develop on microplastics versus natural materials in river water and found that plastics support a distinct pattern of microbial colonization. The research identified specific bacteria capable of degrading microplastics and revealed that competition among microbes on plastic surfaces follows unexpected patterns compared to natural substrates.

Article Tier 2

Understanding the role of turbulence and biofilm on low density microplastic dynamics: An experimental approach towards natural conditions

Flume experiments showed that turbulence in rivers significantly increases the frequency with which buoyant low-density microplastics come into contact with bacterial biofilms on the riverbed — and that this biofilm contact, while capturing only a small percentage of passing particles, helps explain why lightweight plastics are consistently found buried in river sediments despite their tendency to float. The study reveals a two-step process: turbulence drives plastics toward the riverbed, and biofilm properties then control how many stick. This has implications for predicting where microplastics accumulate and how they move through freshwater systems.

Share this paper