0
Article Tier 2 Remediation Sign in to save

Understanding the role of turbulence and biofilm on low density microplastic dynamics: An experimental approach towards natural conditions

AI summary Read the abstract

Flume experiments showed that turbulence in rivers significantly increases the frequency with which buoyant low-density microplastics come into contact with bacterial biofilms on the riverbed — and that this biofilm contact, while capturing only a small percentage of passing particles, helps explain why lightweight plastics are consistently found buried in river sediments despite their tendency to float. The study reveals a two-step process: turbulence drives plastics toward the riverbed, and biofilm properties then control how many stick. This has implications for predicting where microplastics accumulate and how they move through freshwater systems.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The fate of microplastics (MP) in rivers is controlled by particle properties, biological interactions, and hydrodynamics, yet mechanisms governing near-bed behavior of low-density MP remain unclear. Despite their buoyancy, low-density MP are frequently found in sediments, suggesting that turbulence-driven transport and benthic biofilms influence the near-bed transport and retention. Flume experiments quantified how turbulence modulates MP transport, biofilm contact, and MP-biofilm interaction at the sediment-water interface. Flume integrating water, sediment, and biofilm compartments used fluorescent polyethylene spheres (0.995 g cm⁻³; ∼50 µm) under controlled flows. Particle trajectories near a monospecific Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm were reconstructed via particle tracking velocimetry, while turbulence intensity was characterized by friction velocity (u = 0.0009, 0.0014 and 0.0024 m s⁻¹). Increasing turbulence significantly increased MP-biofilm encounters (p < 0.001), with median fractions reaching 3.3-4.3% of all observed MP at u ≥ 0.0014 m s⁻¹ , compared with 1.6% at 0.0009 m s⁻¹ . Most MPs contacting the biofilm originated within the viscous boundary layer, although up to ∼20% came from above under higher turbulence, reflecting a shift in transport pathways. Biofilm retention of MPs remained low (0.6-5.8%) and decreased slightly with turbulence, revealing a trade-off between delivery and attachment. These results indicate a two-step mechanism: turbulence delivers particles to near-bed zone, while biofilm properties govern retention. This coupled process helps explain the presence of buoyant MP in sediments and highlights the role of benthic biofilms in mediating MP exchange between water and riverbeds. The empirical relationships derived here can inform process-based transport models to improve predictions of MP fate and fluxes in fluvial systems.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The role of biofilm and hydrodynamics on the fate of microplastic particles in rivers: an experimental study

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted flume and field experiments to examine how biofilm formation and hydrodynamic conditions govern the fate of microplastic particles in rivers, investigating why some MP-polluted rivers crossing industrialized areas show no significant upstream-to-downstream concentration differences. The study identified biofilm-mediated density changes and turbulence as key factors controlling whether low-density MPs remain suspended or settle into sediments.

Article Tier 2

The role of biofilm and hydrodynamics on the fate of microplastic particles in rivers: an experimental study

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted experimental flume studies to investigate how biofilm formation and hydrodynamic conditions jointly govern microplastic particle fate in rivers, examining why some urbanized and industrialized river reaches show no significant upstream-to-downstream increase in microplastic concentration despite theoretical inputs.

Article Tier 2

The role of turbulence in the deposition of intrinsically buoyant MPs

AI summary Read the abstract

This flume study found that turbulence causes the vertical velocity of buoyant polyethylene microplastics to vary over 4 orders of magnitude compared to their rise rate in still water, explaining how lighter-than-water particles end up deposited in river and lake sediments.

Article Tier 2

Sediment-Water Interfaces as Traps and Sources of Microplastic Fragments and Microfibers─Insights from Stream Flume Experiments

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used controlled stream flume experiments to study how microplastic fibers and fragments settle into riverbed sediments. They found that lower water flow speeds caused faster deposition, with the effect being strongest for fibers, and that traditional settling equations significantly underestimate how microplastics actually behave near the streambed. The findings improve our understanding of where and how microplastics accumulate in rivers.

Article Tier 2

Shifting settling regimes of aquatic microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted laboratory settling experiments and modeling to understand how physical properties of microplastics influence their settling velocity and transport behavior in aquatic environments. They found that biofilm colonization significantly increases settling rates, suggesting that biofouling is a key factor controlling microplastic fate and distribution in rivers and lakes.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper