0
Article Tier 2 Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Toward Understanding the Transport of Nanoplastics in Subsurface Pores

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used quartz crystal microbalance experiments to measure how nanoplastics with different surface charges adsorb onto mineral surfaces in soils and groundwater, finding that surface charge compatibility between particles and mineral oxides strongly governs transport behavior. Ionic strength and humic acid also significantly modulated nanoplastic adsorption, providing key parameters for modeling their subsurface fate.

Polymers

Nanoplastic pollution is not widely recognized as microplastic pollution because nanoparticulate plastics are difficult to collect and analyze. Recent nanoplastic toxicity studies have warranted the need for understanding the transport and fate of nanoplastics in soils and groundwater. Minerals likely determine the transport of nanoplastics (NPs) in the subsurface environment mainly through adsorption of NPs onto the pore surfaces. In the current presentation, we report the kinetics results of NPs adsorption onto SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 surfaces obtained by using quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). Carboxylated polystyrene (CPS) NPs and amine-functionalized polystyrene (APS) NPs with the particle size of ~100 nm were flown through onto SiO 2 - or Al 2 O 3 -coated QCM sensor surface in the range of 0.1 to 100 mM NaCl solution at pH 7. Zeta potential measurement indicated that CPS-NPs and SiO 2 have negative surface charges, but APS-NPs and Al 2 O 3 have positive surface charges. And thus no adsorption occurred for CPS-NPs on SiO 2 surface and for APS-NPs on Al 2 O 3 surface; however, significant adsorption occurred in 100 mM NaCl solution because of the enhanced screening effect of electrolytes on repulsion between NPs and oxide surface. For NPs adsorption to oxide surface with opposite zeta potentials (i.e., CPS-NPs on Al 2 O 3 surface or APS-NPs on SiO 2 surface), substantial amounts of NPs adsorbed even in 0.1 mM NaCl solution. Electrolytes reduce attraction between the NPs and oxide surface, but we found enhanced adsorption of NPs with increasing ionic strengths while the initial adsorption rates decreased with increasing ionic strength. We also present the effect of humic acid on the adsorption. Our results suggest that the transport of NPs in the subsurface pores is strongly influenced by mineral surface types and fluid chemistry. The adsorption kinetics data obtained in the current QCM study may be used as key parameters required for a reliable transport modelling of NPs in soils and groundwater.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Transport of Colloidal Microplastics Through Porous Media

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted column experiments to study how polystyrene microbeads move through quartz sand media, finding that microplastics are retarded by solid-phase sorption and hypothesizing that transport is most efficient through coarse-grained, well-sorted soils, with implications for predicting microplastic fate in terrestrial environments.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic migration in porous media at various scales: a review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed how microplastics move through porous media like soil and sediment across multiple spatial scales, finding that particle surface properties and environmental conditions both influence migration but remain poorly understood. Better understanding of this process is critical for assessing how microplastics spread through terrestrial and groundwater environments.

Article Tier 2

Relevance of Iron Oxyhydroxide and Pore Water Chemistry on the Mobility of Nanoplastic Particles in Water-Saturated Porous Media Environments

AI summary Read the abstract

Laboratory column experiments showed that iron oxyhydroxide surface charge in porous media is a primary control on nanoplastic mobility, with positively charged surfaces trapping negatively charged polystyrene nanoparticles and negatively charged surfaces allowing free transport. Understanding these transport mechanisms in aquifers and sediments is essential for predicting how long nanoplastics persist and where they accumulate in groundwater environments.

Article Tier 2

Transport Mechanism of Microplastic in the Environment

AI summary Read the abstract

This review described the physical and chemical mechanisms by which microplastics are transported through air, water, and soil — including atmospheric deposition, hydrological flow, bioturbation, and biofouling — that collectively explain their detection in remote environments from Arctic sea ice to mountain summits. Elucidating these transport mechanisms reveals that no geographic location or ecosystem is isolated from microplastic contamination, underscoring the inevitability of human exposure through air, water, and food globally.

Article Tier 2

Challenges in characterization of nanoplastics in the environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Nanoplastics — plastic particles smaller than 1 micrometer — pose significant analytical challenges because existing spectroscopic techniques like FTIR and Raman spectroscopy lack the sensitivity to reliably detect and characterize them in environmental samples. This gap in detection capability means nanoplastic abundance and toxicity are severely underestimated, representing a critical frontier for understanding the full scope of plastic pollution's health impacts.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper