0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Assessing the effectiveness of microplastic extraction methods on fishmeal with different properties

Analytical Methods 2022 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Chloe Way, Chloe Way, I.D. Williams, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, I.D. Williams, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Chloe Way, I.D. Williams, G. John Langley, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, G. John Langley, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, Malcolm D. Hudson, G. John Langley, Robert Marsh Malcolm D. Hudson, I.D. Williams, I.D. Williams, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, I.D. Williams, I.D. Williams, Malcolm D. Hudson, I.D. Williams, I.D. Williams, Robert Marsh

Summary

Researchers evaluated microplastic extraction methods across five fishmeal types varying in protein, organic, carbonate, and density composition, finding that a calcium chloride overflow with dispersant and potassium hydroxide digestion achieved the highest recovery rate (66.3% in sardine and anchovy meal) and concluding that previously reported microplastic concentrations in fishmeal are likely underestimated due to inadequate methodology.

Microplastic presence in fishmeal is an emerging research area because of its potential to enter food chains, and the importance of fishmeal within global food security. However, fishmeal is a complex medium dependant on fish composition. This study measured properties (organics, carbonates, protein and density) of five fishmeal types (trimmings, sardine and anchovy, krill, tuna and salmon), sourced from locations worldwide (Norway, South America, Antarctica, Spain and Scotland). Microplastic recovery rates were compared for existing methodologies using sodium chloride overflows and potassium hydroxide digestions and then compared to newly developed methods. These methods included dispersants and calcium chloride density separations which were developed and designed to be environmentally conscious and affordable, which we argue should become an international standard approach for researchers. A calcium chloride overflow with dispersant and potassium hydroxide digestion provided the highest recovery rate in sardine and anchovy fishmeal (66.3%). Positive correlations with recovery rate were found with protein content, and negative correlations with organic content. Low recovery rates found here suggest microplastics in fishmeal reported in the literature are underestimated. With complex media such as fishmeal, attention must be paid to variation between types and composition when choosing methods and interpreting results.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper