We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Sizing individual dielectric nanoparticles with quantitative differential interference contrast microscopy
Summary
Researchers developed a quantitative differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy method to measure individual dielectric nanoparticle sizes with high accuracy, using polystyrene beads as standards to determine radii within a few nanometers, demonstrating sensitivity potentially reaching 1.8 nm and applying the technique to nanodiamond sizing and nanoplastic detection.
We report a method to measure the size of single dielectric nanoparticles with high accuracy and precision using quantitative differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. Dielectric nanoparticles are detected optically by the conversion of the optical phase change into an intensity change using DIC. Phase images of individual nanoparticles were retrieved from DIC by Wiener filtering, and a quantitative methodology to extract nanoparticle sizes was developed. Using polystyrene beads of 100 nm radius as size standard, we show that the method determines this radius within a few nm accuracy. The smallest detectable polystyrene bead is limited by background and shot-noise, which depend on acquisition and analysis parameters, including the objective numerical aperture, the DIC phase offset, and the refractive index contrast between particles and their surrounding. Measurements on small beads of 15 nm nominal radius are shown, and a sensitivity limit potentially reaching down to 1.8 nm radius was inferred. As application example, individual nanodiamonds with nominal sizes below 50 nm were measured, and were found to have a nearly exponential size distribution with 28 nm mean value. Considering the importance of dielectric nanoparticles in many fields, from naturally occurring virions to polluting nanoplastics, the proposed method could offer a powerful quantitative tool for nanoparticle analysis, combining accuracy, sensitivity and high-throughput with widely available and easy-to-use DIC microscopy.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Measurement of Submicron Particle Size Using Scattering Angle-Corrected Polarization Difference with High Angular Resolution
Researchers developed a method for measuring submicron particle size using scattering angle-corrected polarization difference with high angular resolution, addressing the need for accurate size characterisation of particles whose properties are strongly size-dependent. The polarized light scattering approach demonstrated improved precision for particles in the submicron range compared to conventional techniques.
Direct Nanoplastics Detection Below the Diffraction Limit Using Micro Raman
Researchers demonstrated that micro-Raman spectroscopy can directly detect polystyrene nanoplastic particles as small as 20 nm — far below the normal diffraction limit. This advances analytical capabilities for detecting the smallest nanoplastic particles in environmental samples.
Single-nanoplastic detection based on plasmon-coupled scattering microscopy
Researchers developed plasmon-coupled scattering microscopy (PCSM) as a new method for detecting and characterising individual nanoplastic particles down to single-particle sensitivity. The technique offers higher resolution and lower cost than traditional approaches and was validated against known nanoplastic standards.
Defining the size ranges of polystyrene nanoplastics according to their ability to cross biological barriers
Researchers systematically examined polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes to define the size ranges at which they can cross biological barriers, providing a more precise definition of nanoplastic dimensions relevant to toxicological assessment.
How small a nanoplastic can be? A discussion on the size of this ubiquitous pollutant
Researchers explored the question of how small nanoplastic particles can actually be, highlighting the lack of standardized size definitions for this emerging pollutant. They examined the analytical challenges involved in detecting and characterizing nanoplastics at the smallest scales. The study calls for a clearer framework around nanoplastic size boundaries, since particle size is a key factor influencing toxicity and environmental behavior.